If you have not long ago figured this out, Big Brother captures all of your electronic communications, including texts, e-mails, and cell phone calls. You have no privacy rights in a communist country.
As a great American, Paul Harvey, used to say, here is the rest of the Judge Karsmitz story.
I had reviewed the motion to dismiss filed against Dr. Page. Based on my 26 years work in the area of defamation law, the motion should have been quickly denied. The complaint undisputedly set forth a valid cause of action under the well pleaded facts (which the Court must accept as true for purposes of ruling on a motion to dismiss).
After my license was revoked, Dr. Page retained Todd McMurtry to replace me. You know Todd. He worked with me as co-counsel on the Nicholas Sandmann cases before Nicholas terminated me as his counsel (but not before I successfully negotiated settlements foe Nicholas with CNN and the Washington Post).
Not surprisingly, I was told Todd did an excellent job on short notice at the Page motion to dismiss hearing.
Judge Karsmitz thereafter granted the motion to dismiss and threw Dr. Page’s libel case out of court.
Just to complete the circle on the order of Judge Karsmitz:
1. Karsmitz asked for a conference with just local counsel in the Page case. 2. He informed counsel that he had received “death threats” because of his sua sponte order questioning my pro hac vice status. 3. He said he wanted to quietly resolve the issue. 4. Dr. Page had asked me to withdraw my appearance to avoid delay in his libel case which had a pending motion to dismiss. I agreed as I always put the interests of my client ahead of my interests. 5. Dr. Page’s local counsel informed the Court that I would file my legal defenses to his sua sponte order and then I would withdraw voluntarily from the case which would render the issue MOOT. No ruling would be necessary. Judge Karsmitz AGREED to that process.
That should have been the end of the story but WAIT, after that agreement was reached, Judge Karsmitz went ahead and issued his scathing public order revoking my pro hac vice license.
One could surmise that I was politically set up to be wrongfully smeared and have my professional reputation wrongfully damaged with the public.
I guess the dissent of Justice Thomas and the quote of Pence should be called to the Court’s attention. Do you agree?
I am appealing the Karsmitz order to the Supreme Court of Delaware. Will that court correct this egregious error? We shall see.
I will not go quietly in the night.
If they can do this to me, every lawyer is at risk based on the political winds and political agendas.
The practice of law, the rule of law, and the administration of justice is nonpartisan and MUST remain so. Otherwise, we are ALL at risk.
The DELAWARE judge who wrongfully revoked my pro hac vice in Dr. Page’s case was Craig A. Karsmitz.
Below is the order Judge Karsmitz entered against me. I had forgotten that he also suggested I was responsible for the January 6 “insurrection” in Washington, D.C.! Are you kidding me? I had NO involvement whatsoever in that event.
A Delaware judge revoked my pro hac vice license preventing me from representing Dr. Carter Page. No complaint had been filed against me - the Judge acted sua sponte (on his own).
One of the grounds of revocation was based on mistakes in pleadings in cases in other states filed by lawyers working with Sidney Powell (I love Sidney). I did not draft those pleadings and the mistakes were corrected when brought to the lawyers’ attention.
The only other ground relied upon to revoke my pro hac was for filing a “baseless” claim in my lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State. I was the plaintiff in that case. The lawsuit was drafted and filed by a lawyer I hired to research and pursue the issue.
The propriety of that lawsuit was recognized by Justice Clarence Thomas in his recent well-reasoned dissent in the election cases.
Now below is a recent quote by a former high ranking government official that embodies the same principle pursued by me as a GA plaintiff and recognized as correct by Justice Thomas:
“Many of the most troubling voting irregularities took place in states that set aside laws enacted by state legislatures in favor of sweeping changes ordered by governors, secretaries of state, and courts.”
“Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing.” - 1 Peter 3:16-17