Does lack of aspiration explain covid vaccine adverse reaction | Robin Monotti Cory Morningstar

Does lack of aspiration explain covid vaccine adverse reactions?

Yes - according to Marc Girardot's bolus theory

"If a vaccine is intended to be injected into a muscle (“intramuscular IM”) rather than into a vein (“intravenous/intravascular IV”, i.e. directly into the blood stream) then, to avoid accidental injection into a vein, the technique of aspiration has traditionally been applied.

But aspiration was NOT recommended for the covid vaccines
Remarkably, aspiration was not recommended when the covid vaccines were rolled out world-wide at the start of 2021. In the following video the eminent Danish Professor Niels Høiby talks about the serious adverse reactions that can result from accidental IV of the covid vaccines. As a result of a case (early in 2021) of exactly such a serious adverse reaction, Prof Høiby convinced the Danish Government to recommend aspiration for all covid vaccines in March 2021. Sadly, when John Campbell wrote to the then UK Health Minister Sajid Javid in 2021 asking for aspiration to be used to administer the covid vaccines, Mr Javid replied negatively, saying it was not needed.

@RobinMG 's note: CAN SOMEONE PROVIDE AND POST AS A COMMENT THIS CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DR JOHN CAMPBELL AND SAJID JAVID?

..even when aspiration is applied, intramuscular shots go intravascular 1.5-2% of the time and that the overall the rate is at least 5%. With the covid mass vaccination programme many of the vaccinators were extremely inexperienced (often receiving minimal training) and it is likely the rate was significantly higher still. But even, more worrying, is the fact that what also really matters is how fast the plunger is pushed.

Marc Girardot’s bolus theory

If an accidental intravenous injection of a covid vaccine is administered with a fast push of the plunger then a serious adverse reaction is very likely."

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/does-lack-of-aspiration-explain-covid