Robin Monotti Cory Morningstar

2023-06-06 16:21:19 NEW - WHO will take up the EU system of digital vaccine passports to "establish a global system that will help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats."

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3043

@disclosetv Open / Comment

2023-06-06 12:35:37 I am aware petitions don’t work, but that doesn’t mean they have no value at all. At very least, they tell you people are concerned like you are.
Best wishes
Mike

{https://lifepetitions.com/petition/stop-tedros-who-pandemic-treaty?utm_source=lp_social} Open / Comment

2023-06-06 12:34:51 What Does "Novel" Virus Really Mean?
Robin Monotti

Robin's comment and questions on the 2015 paper by Menachery, Yount & Baric.

I work with language, namely I worked on academic papers for many years as University lecturer and researcher. I have an MA in History and Theory, and attended several years of a language based PhD. I am a published translator. I work with film scripts on a daily basis, including writing them. Therefore I am experienced with words. This analysis is word based, not science based. I believe words are shared across professions, therefore people who work with words like me are more than legitimized in asking questions of the words used by scientists for whom words come generally after experiments are allegedly conducted, like in the case below. These are my language based questions. I believe language is used to both reveal and conceal:

The paper claims that the bat CoVs were "circulating". Does this mean they were already circulating in humans? Circulating to me means not new: not novel.

Then it mentions they built a "chimeric" virus. Chimeric, from the word chimera, means a virus that contains at least two different parts of different viruses. Essentially the circulating virus is mixed with another part of a circulating virus, in this case, is it a part of the HIV virus mentioned in the context of "pseudotyping"? Does this make it a "novel" virus given both parts were in circulation? The paper claims not a novel virus, but a "novel, zoonotic" CoV spike protein. If the spike protein in question is novel, then how can it be zoonotic already?

Zoonotic means already present in another species. This opens up the question of time: when does the virus jump species as claimed? Could it have been thousands of years ago? In which case "novel" and "zoonotic" are contradictions?

The specific bat virus used as a base is mentioned and named: RsSHCO14, isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats.

The part added is described as an HIV-based pseudovirus?

Note that the government funding via USAID & EcoHealth Alliance to "Z.-L.S." was initially omitted. Are these not the initials of Zhengli-Li Shi at Wuhan Lab?

Was the funding originally omitted from the paper reinstated because gain of function was banned within US territory so they had to cover themselves and say it was done in Wuhan?

Please note that where the "chimeric" virus was assembled is NOT necessarily the same thing as where the virus was released. Both may be untrue, but please do not confuse the claim the virus was assembled in Wuhan with the claim the virus was released in Wuhan. Both maybe false, or one may be true and one false, or both maybe true.

I generally believe reality to be more complex than: all is a lie, or all is true.

Robin Monotti

@RobinMG

https://t.me/robinmg/27532 Open / Comment

2023-06-06 12:33:31 My plea to Dr Robert Malone.
I fear he & David Martin are using their extensive platforms inter alia to reinforce the idea that there’s been a novel & often lethal respiratory virus striding across the globe. It wasn’t true. But they speak as though it is true. This is why I’ve paid such close attention to the topic.
Please don’t shoot the messenger
Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon — just now — Edit
Dear Robert, I’m impressed by your work rate and your insightful passion. I’m troubled by one really important thing, though! You’re surely aware of the epidemiological analyses by Denis Rancourt and colleagues? This shows by analysis of state by state all causes mortality (age, sex, date only, ignoring claims of cause of death, since this is subject to manipulation) that there was no excess death anywhere until after WHO called a pandemic. They did so based on “confirmed cases”, which you & I know if essentially fraud, since PCR cannot be used as a clinical diagnostic. What Rancourt’s findings rule out is a pandemic. His analyses show this in several ways (one of which I’ve just mentioned). Another is the age profile of the dead: completely inconsistent with a respiratory viral illness. Third is that all causes mortality varies according to jurisdiction and that points firmly to policy and not a spreading pathogen as cause of death. The bottom lines are two fold. 1. There is no evidence of any kind of pandemic 2. Therefore there wasn’t a novel respiratory virus, either. It was all lies. There’s copious evidence of planning for a “pandemic” going back over 25 years. All had authoritarian regimes and mass vaccination as objectives. Now, Event 201 (autumn 2019) crowned these tabletop simulations, the fictional occurrence was “a novel coronavirus emerges in China & spreads around the world”. We’re expected to believe this astonishing concurrence with claimed reality just 3-4 months later is luck. I find it not credible. The pandemic is a lie, like the other nine or so lies that were promulgated by main media. The evidence that matters shows there wasn’t a pandemic. The authorities knew there wasn’t a pandemic. In light of this, all the oppressive “measures” should rightly be seen as planned terrorism. Not “mistakes”. No mistakes were made. The objective was to get a needle in every arm. You & I know that causing expression of a non-self protein axiomatically drives lethal autoimmune attack on every cell that took up the injected material, this is Immunology 101. It’s how our immune system distinguishes friend (self) from foe (non-self). The mRNA based injections were formulated with lipid nano particles (LNP). We’ve known for years in peer reviewed papers that LNP formulated macromolecules migrate everywhere in the body, but accumulate in certain organs, notably ovaries. It is my contention that there never was a novel respiratory virus pandemic. Furthermore, it is my contention that the massed lies of governments around the world bore down on people and frightened & coerced or even mandated them to receive deliberately toxic injections. Their design brief was to cause injury, to maim & to kill. I’d be VERY keen to hear you comment about Rancourt’s analyses and my assessment of foreign protein encoded mRNA products. It’s very important that you level with your large audience which you’ve worked hard to create and cultivate (bless you!). Please tell them there wasn’t a novel virus & that the injections were carefully designed to hurt people. If you don’t do these things, I fear you’re inadvertently amplifying the perpetrators intentions. They’ll tell us “There’s another virus, come get your jabs”. You almost alone can bring this massed global crime to a halt. Please use your substantial powers so to do. Best wishes and thanks Mike Dr Mike Yeadon (Pls search using eg Yandex & not eg Google. Why the extensive differences in what’s returned and what’s the meaning of such differences).

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/dr-malone-has-the-covid-crisis-rendered-national-sovereignty-obsolete/ Open / Comment

2023-06-06 12:30:53 I recall wondering if the DNA “vaccines” were distraction agents, to be abandoned in favour of mRNA based injections.
Perhaps it was always intended that AZ & JNJ products will go.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fda-revokes-emergency-approval-for-johnson-johnson-covid-shot/ Open / Comment

2023-06-06 11:28:51 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-who-eu-announce-partnership-creating-global-system-of-digital-vaccine-passports/

I find this thoroughly macabre as I predicted it at least three years ago. I recall telling my family that time will soon come when you won’t be able to enter a shop, potentially not even leave your home, without some kind of real time checking, testing or certification.
This’ll start with international travel because we’ve been properly trained to accept any indignity in order to get on an aeroplane.
Best wishes
Mike Open / Comment

2023-06-06 09:41:03 And another one bites the dust.
The WW2-ending atomic bombing of Hiroshima & Nagasaki were definitely not nuclear weapons. Instead, it appears they were instead very large firebox’s, napalm, mustard gas (toxicity mimics whole body irradiation to a large extent) & modified magnesium flare-based devices.
Worse, the allies knew that Japan was ready to surrender, in terms similar to those that Truman’s administration finally accepted, long before (early 1945, if not earlier) these alleged atom bombs were dropped.
The evidence that these cities were destroyed by conventional weapons is overwhelming. As with much more recent frauds, there was intense suppression of sceptics voices in the US, especially those who were highly qualified to have seen through the lies. Additionally, the Japanese people were subjected to a propaganda campaign to overcome any resistance to the notion that these were atomic weapons.
Richard Palmer I know a little, as he was or still is a member of Doctors4CovidEthics. He’s a sticker for evidence. It was not Richard’s original idea that the Hiroshima & Nagasaki weapons weren’t nuclear. There’s an earlier volume picking through much the same evidence & the author reaches the same conclusion: it was all faked.
As for motive, if you’re already persuaded by what people like me have uncovered in relation to the “covid19 pandemic”, you probably won’t have any particular difficulty in accepting that “nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan in order to hasten the end of WW2” narrative was faked. Exactly why isn’t clear & the author tells us that he’s speculating. However, it does tie in with the global control agenda, a plot whose beginnings may be much older than most of us at first thought.
Best wishes
Mike

https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited/page/299/mode/1up Open / Comment

2023-06-06 09:14:53 Robin Monotti Explains How He Worked with Eric Clapton on Heart of a Child, and Created The Book of Vision Movie

I believe that to achieve a change across the spectrum - beyond people like us who have a good grasp of what's going on - One of our strongest weapons is culture.

And within culture, one of our most powerful weapons to cross over to the other side is art...

Early on, we started a collaboration to do with information to do with news, to do with analysis, with Dr. Mike Yeadon and Cory Morningstar. And we started a telegram channel.

Then as a spinoff from the channel, Eric Clapton reached out and asked me to help with the lyrics of two songs, one is called Heart of a Child and another one is called Pompous Fool...

Something else I did is a film which I received the script of in 2017.

The script was about the a journey into the history of the doctor patient relationship. The approach was from the point of view of the philosophy of medicine in the form of a historical fantasy drama [Book of Vision] Open / Comment

2023-06-06 08:23:55 "But that's just a conspiracy theory How do we disrupt their programming"



Open / Comment

2023-06-06 07:55:35 Yuval Noah Harari | "The Next Election In the U.S. In November 2024 Is Likely to Be Run to a Large Extent By A.I."

"A.I. Can Create Religions." "It Makes It Possible to Monitor What's Happening Inside Their Body." Open / Comment