2021-08-18 14:32:04
CONFRONTING THE FALSE NARRATIVE
I keep running into people who say we need to find 160k fraudulent votes in Michigan for any of this to matter.
Why do people say we have to find 160k bad votes? Why isn’t 10,000 fraudulent votes enough? Why isn’t finding a fraud pattern across multiple counties and states enough?
You are allowing the liberal media to control your narrative. And when you are willing to debate inside the narrative, you lose. Period. That’s how narratives are designed.
There is (1) “real voter fraud” (which decertifies an election and allows the recall of electors) and there is (2) “you have to overcome 160k fraudulent votes.” Why do we need to find ALL of the bad votes? And if we did, they would say we have to find every type of fraud. If they cheated even more and Biden was certified with +600k, does that move the goalpost again, and now we need to find that many?
There is evidence of “real voter fraud” and there is the liberal narrative of “you must find all of the fraud.” The first is real, the second is a fake narrative. They are severable. Don’t get sucked into the narrative.
Another example, there is “civil rights” and there is “BLM.” The first is a real thing that we need to discuss, the second is a Marxist constructed narrative. They are severable. One is real, one is fake.
Never fall for narrative.
9.1K viewsedited 11:32
V
