2024-05-03 16:06:57
BRIEF REPORT on the TRIAL against the German CITIZENS' LAWYER Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. The witnesses confirm his statements.
Car and other mishaps
Today StA John was present without the support of the chief prosecutor. Justus Hoffmann and Viviane Fischer were not present.
Defense lawyer Dr. Miseré was delayed due to a car breakdown. Tobias Weissenborn was questioned again in detail on today's trial day. He answered the questions put to him in the same detailed and extremely confident manner as during the last interrogation. There were additions, namely he was explicitly asked about his perception regarding the class action and the client terminations. Clients had terminated their mandates at the time due to the data leak and transferred their matters, or powers of attorney, to Reiner Füllmich. This means that he was instructed to reclaim the client's money. Marcel Templin no longer had any legal right to act as the representative of the community of interests in this respect, as this was also the formal legal responsibility of Reiner Füllmich.
Weissenborn gave his testimony meticulously and in detail, enriched with expert legal explanations.
According to Weissenborn, Templin's actions were legally questionable.
They should have filed a complaint and informed the bar association, he continued.
Füllmich had always relied on communication or the settlement route, i.e. ultimately on an amicable agreement. He was under an illusion; he wanted to avoid trouble or declaratory actions.
Regarding the loans, Weissenborn said that they could of course be utilized, as they all had sole power of representation.
Weissenborn confirmed Reiner Füllmich's statements and was a witness for the defense.
Finally, the chairman read out the preliminary legal assessment of the case, which can only be regarded as devastating.
PART 2 of the SHORT REPORT from the trial day in the proceedings against civil rights activist Dr. Reiner Füllmich (May 3): THE TRICKY COURT - after it became clear that the loan agreements between Füllmich and the company actually existed and that he was authorized to conclude these agreements, the court changes its prosecution strategy. It says: these were not loan agreements after all.... The goal: a CONDEMNATION AT ANY PRICE.
Everyone present in the courtroom seemed shocked, the remarks almost brutal.
As if everything was now being tried to construct what the witness statements did not provide.
The loan agreements were interpreted as sham loan agreements that primarily constituted fiduciary asset management. The chamber thus considered it proven that Füllmich had acted unlawfully.
The audience was confronted with a completely original interpretation of the law. Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann, as co-partners, should always have been informed. In addition, collusion between Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer was no longer assumed.
In plain language, this means that Viviane Fischer would now be completely exonerated. (Note: this is still a preliminary legal assessment).
She would not be seen by the chamber as someone who had done something wrong.
Attorney Dr. Miseré filed a motion to suspend the main hearing, as the defense has a completely different legal opinion. A transcript of this will follow later with the consent of the defense.
Attorney Miseré also stated that he assumed that the proceedings were politicized, which could be interpreted from the fact that Reiner Füllmich was illegally brought from Mexico to Germany.
Despite the exonerating witnesses, who gave detailed, expert and credible testimony, the chamber made this preliminary legal assessment.
In addition, further dates beyond 15.05.2024 until July were scheduled in the event that the defense wishes to submit further motions for evidence - witnesses.
The chamber made it clear that it was no longer necessary to hear further witnesses - supplement: that no further witnesses would be heard ex officio.
@wearegreeekja
15.5K views13:06
R
