Dr Naomi R Wolf

2021-08-16 23:57:42 The Universal Antidote Documentary The science and story of Chlorine Dioxide.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-15 22:25:45 ​​ Read the beginning of the article
Part 2/2.

Endgame: All COVID-19 vaccines have this toxic ingredient

Former Pfizer employee Karen Kingston confirmed that the company’s BNT-162b2 mRNA vaccine, made in partnership with German company BioNTech, did contain graphene oxide. Podcast host Stew Peters asked her if the New York-based company’s vaccine had the toxic ingredient. “100 percent it is, and it’s irrefutable,” Kingston answered.

Peters also acknowledged the findings of La Quinta Columna, a group of independent researchers from Spain. The group revealed in a video that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine contained traces of graphene oxide. Further scrutiny by La Quinta Columna also unveiled that vaccines from Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine and AstraZeneca’s two-dose adenovirus vaccine also contained the dangerous chemical.

Prior to Kingston’s appearance, Peters invited Dr. Jane Ruby to his podcast. During her interview, Ruby showed Peters some blood samples that showed the negative effects of graphene oxide. Ruby also revealed the discoveries of La Quinta Columna regarding graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines during her conversation with the podcast host.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-15 22:25:20 Graphene oxide used in coronavirus vaccines linked to adverse events, even death

The toxic components in Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines have caused the death of many inoculated Americans. One particular component – graphene oxide – played a huge role in many fatalities linked to COVID-19 vaccines. However, a new report revealed that this major ingredient in mRNA vaccines was included as part of a larger depopulation agenda.

Graphene oxide is often used in medicine for detecting diseases, carrying different drugs and producing antibacterial materials. True enough, it served as a key component of the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. Graphene oxide deprived organ systems of much-needed oxygen, which led to serious adverse reactions in many inoculated individuals.

In a piece for State of the Nation, Steven Fishman elaborated on how lethal graphene oxide kills vaccinated individuals. Fishman spoke to his friend Dr. Mylo Canderian about the matter. The Greek-born scientist and medical contributor to the World Health Organization developed the patent for graphene oxide as a bioweapon in 2015.

Outside of his medical achievements, Canderian ardently supported Klaus Schwab and his idea of the Great Reset. Fishman described his friend as a “genocidal globalist” who believed in the extermination of the “plague” that is humanity.

According to Canderian, 95 percent of the world’s population are “useless eaters” that need to be exterminated as quickly as possible. “Look at downtown Chicago, Baltimore or Los Angeles and you will clearly see why the useless eaters must be put down like rabid dogs,” he said Canderian expressed similar disdain for educators promoting critical race theory, calling them “infectious.”

The End of Cycle Formula – the so-called “depopulation equation”

Fishman noted that Canderian was confident of the COVID-19 vaccine putting an end to the “cancer” that is humanity. He asked the scientist about how vaccinated individuals can know with certainty their remaining time on Earth after they get the vaccine. Canderian then revealed information about the easy to calculate End of Cycle Formula (EOCF).

He told Fishman: “There is a maximum cycle of 10 years from injection to end of cycle i.e. death, and it is extremely easy to determine.” According to Canderian, the percentage of a vaccinated person’s blood contaminated with graphene oxide was multiplied by the decade-long maximum cycle to determine the person’s remaining lifespan in years. He added that any hematologist can immediately determine graphene oxide levels in the blood using either a standard or electron microscope.

Based on the formula, a vaccinated person whose blood had 20 percent graphene oxide would still live for eight years after inoculation (10 – 10*0.20 = 8). Similarly, a vaccinated person with 70 percent graphene oxide in their blood would not live beyond three years following inoculation (10 – 10*0.70 = 3).

Fishman also asked about the effects of succeeding vaccine doses and their effects on the EOCF. Canderian replied that the additional doses would increase graphene oxide levels in the blood. “The more shots … they get, the worse their blood will look under a microscope – and the quicker they will turn into fertilizer,” he said. Part 1/2. @naomirwolf
Read more Open / Comment

2021-08-13 23:33:38 ​​Study: Even people with mild COVID-19 may develop lifelong natural immunity to the coronavirus

A recent study published in the journal Nature suggests that people who recovered from a mild case of COVID-19 may have developed lifelong immunity to the Wuhan coronavirus.

Researchers from the Washington University School of Medicine arrived at this finding after tracking people who have had mild COVID-19. They found that these individuals still had immune cells that produce antibodies specific to the virus nearly a year after infection. This led the researchers to conclude that these immune cells would never go away and would keep recovered patients protected for life.

“These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of people’s lives,” said Ali Ellebedy, an associate professor of pathology and immunology and a co-author of the study. “That’s strong evidence for long-lasting immunity.”

Mainstream media reported last year that immunity might be short-lived because COVID-19 antibodies wane quickly after infection. But Ellebedy said that that was a misinterpretation of the data.

“It’s normal for antibody levels to go down after acute infection but they don’t go down to zero – they plateau,” she explained.

Immune cells that produce COVID-19 antibodies are in it for long the haul

For their study, Ellebedy and her colleagues recruited 77 people who recovered from a mild COVID-19 infection and collected samples of their blood three months after they tested positive. They also took bone marrow samples from eighteen participants seven to eight months after infection, five of which returned four months later to provide a second sample. For comparison, the researchers also collected bone marrow samples from 11 people who never contracted the virus.

The researchers found that COVID-19 antibodies decreased quickly a few months after recovery but did not disappear entirely. Instead, antibody levels stabilized and remained detectable within 11 months of infection.

Moreover, 15 of the participants who provided bone marrow samples still had bone marrow plasma cells that produce COVID-19 antibodies. The five volunteers that came back also had these immune cells four months later. Meanwhile, the researchers did not detect the cells in the bone marrow of all the volunteers who never contracted the virus.

In view of these findings, the researchers said that there was no reason to think that these immune cells would ever go away in those who recovered from mild infections even though their COVID-19 antibodies decreased. Ellebedy explained that the immune cells migrate to the bone marrow and start producing fewer antibodies after recovery, but that that doesn’t mean they are gone for good.

“These cells are not dividing. They are quiescent, just sitting in the bone marrow and secreting antibodies,” she said. “They have been doing that ever since the infection resolved, and they will continue doing that indefinitely.”

But it remains unclear whether people who recovered from severe COVID-19 also developed long-lasting immunity. Jackson Turner, an instructor of pathology and immunology and the lead author of the study, said that things go could go either way.

“Inflammation plays a major role in severe COVID-19, and too much inflammation can lead to defective immune responses,” he explained. “But on the other hand, the reason why people get really sick is often because they have a lot of virus in their bodies, and having a lot of virus around can lead to a good immune response. So it’s not clear.”

That being said, Turner noted that the study needs to be replicated in people with moderate to severe infections to determine whether they would develop lifelong immunity to the virus. But overall, the researchers concluded that those with mild infections might be protected from the coronavirus for life.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-13 00:03:00 ​​New side effects from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines include kidney inflammation, renal disorders and skin reactions

The European Medicine Agency (EMA) is reporting new adverse events from the experimental COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna. These new adverse events, which include skin reactions and kidney ailments, are more than just side effects – they are symptoms of poisoning, signs that the recipient’s blood and filtration organs are tainted by foreign toxins. And that’s exactly what these vaccines are designed to do – infiltrate the blood and the organs with engineered spike proteins, forcibly replicated by the body’s own cells.

Newly identified health issues include microvasculature issues in the skin, kidney inflammation and excessive protein loss

These newly identified skin reactions and kidney ailments may not be on EMA’s list of reportable adverse events following vaccination, so the agency is unable to collect accurate data and understand the extent of the poisoning. The newly identified ailments include Erythema multiforme, a skin reaction mediated by immune cells in the superficial microvasculature of the skin and oral mucous membranes. The skin reaction may be mild or severe, causing lesions to form across the skin.

Erythema multiforme can occur after an infection or after drug exposure. Because the spike proteins from the vaccine are delivered outside the cell, can demonstrably circulate in the blood, and cause mini clots to form in the microvasculature, this skin condition is likely a symptom of vaccine damage. This injury could be a sign that the spike proteins circulate further into the cardiovascular system than is previously understood, interfering with immune complexes in the skin.

Another newly identified ailment is glomerulonephritis, a type of kidney inflammation. Because the spike protein can circulate in the blood, is inflammatory by nature, and can concentrate in vital organs like the kidneys, this vaccine injury is more than possible.

Finally, the EMA is looking at how the COVID vaccines cause nephrotic syndrome. This renal disorder leads to heavy urinary protein losses. As more people report this health problem after vaccination, this could be one of the first signs that this mRNA vaccine technology has retrained immune cells to attack natural proteins in the body.

This experimental technology is the first attempt to create foreign toxins in the body’s own cells. If the immune cells learn to attack what the body’s own cells have produced, a runaway effect could occur whereby the immune cells target natural proteins in the body. On the other hand, the body could be dumping excess proteins in an attempt to eliminate the spike proteins from the body, leading to excessive loss of other important proteins.

Systemic autoimmune, cardiovascular, and inflammatory conditions go undiagnosed as spike proteins wreak havoc on the population

The EMA disclosed these new side effects when they updated the safety section of their vaccine database, adding more potential health issues to a growing list of serious harms caused by the vaccines. However, like most adverse events, these kidney issues and skin reactions will not be disclosed on the vaccine label.

The FDA has already warned that young patients are experiencing needless heart inflammation after getting vaccinated. These shots are also causing blood clots, blindness, and other severe cardiovascular damage. At this time, none of these serious health issues matter to the FDA, the CDC, WHO, the NHS, the EMA and other regulatory agencies.

These regulatory agencies believe these poisons provide benefits that are worth the suffering. Many of these new health issues taking place inside the body of the vaccinated people cannot be accurately labeled as an adverse event or side effect because the issues taking place inside them are systemic, affect multiple organs in different ways, and exhibit various unknown autoimmune effects that cannot be consistently measured.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-12 17:55:42 Dr. Peter McCullough - Ends The Pandemic With 5 COVID Facts

1. The virus does not spread asymptomatically.

2. We should never test asymptomatic people.

3. Natural immunity is robust, complete, and durable.

4. COVID-19 is easily treatable at home.

5. The current vaccines are obsolete, unsafe, and unfit for human use.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-11 22:00:12 ​​“Long Covid” is Fauci’s code phrase for long-term vaccine damage

According to Anthony Fauci, who flip-flops Covid safety advice nearly daily, a new syndrome has arrived called “long COVID,” and it’s a whole series of long-term health conditions caused by the Covid vaccines, but blamed on the virus. These “conditions” including fatigue, shortness of breath, and loss of senses, including smell, taste, sight and hearing. Long-term means it may never subside or go away, by the way. This is all according to new studies that have emerged, but are getting buried by MSM.

“Long Covid” is the cover story now for debilitating Covid vaccine side effects and adverse events

Every day now we are hearing that Delta is spreading, yet there’s no test for it. How odd. Now Fauci is all smiles while explaining that a new, more deadly Covid variant called Lambda is seeking humans for mass destruction. The variants were the first alibi for vaccine-induced injuries and deaths, but since Delta is so weak, the narrative is shifting quickly to “Deadly Lambda” and “Long Covid” as the reason tens of thousands of people are dying from rare “events” like sudden blood clots in the lungs, brain and stomach appearing just days after Covid vaccination.

To top it all off, Fauci admitted that the Covid vaccines are literally responsible for spreading disease. In other words, herd theory is blown wide open as a hoax because the vaccinated sheeple are shedding and spreading their injected GM disease onto each other, especially since the trillions of miniscule blood clots caused by the Covid jabs are causing the immune system to be weaker, and blood flow to be severely limited on oxygen and nutrients. Add the oxygen-depriving Covid masks all day and you have a real pandemic, and it’s almost all between the Covid-vaccinated, which turns out to be 50 percent of all Americans.

Fauci claims “breakthrough” cases, meaning people who get vaccinated and still get a light case of Covid afterwards, are susceptible to “Long Covid”

“We already know that people who get breakthrough infections and don’t go on to get advanced disease requiring hospitalization, they too are susceptible to long COVID,” Fauci claims. This is the ultimate cover for vaccines that not only do NOT work, but cause damage to the body, including damage to the vascular system, motor skills, respiratory tract, the 5 senses and overall immune function.

Anyone suffering from vaccine damage is quickly labeled “anti-vax” and “anti-science” if they talk about it on social media or inform the media in any way. Then all of their health detriment that’s caused by the mRNA and “protein payload injections” are all blamed on Covid variants and “Long Covid,” a completely made-up term that Fauci doesn’t mind using because everything else he’s said has turned out to be made up also.

Realize that if someone you know is pro-vaccine right now, that also means they are anti-science, because if they would look at the science, they would clearly see that vaccines are not safe or effective, but rather dangerous and defective.

Breakthrough cases happen because the Covid vaccines barely work, and when they do, they wane in power within a month or two, down to a very low, ineffective percentage of approximately 15 to 20 percent. That’s why the whole vaccine industry, including the CDC and NIH, are calling for Covid vaccines to be mandatory and happen every three months, to fight the new “variants” and as “boosters” when the fake vaccines “wear off.”

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-11 19:15:57 ​​ Read the beginning of the article
Part 2/2.
To further explore existing evidence, the Spanish researchers reviewed studies that focused on the carcinogenic compounds found in meat products and the mechanisms by which they are generated. They listed the following toxic chemicals as substances of safety concern in meats:

- N-nitrosamines — Also called N-nitroso compounds, these carcinogens are formed via the reaction between nitrite, a common food additive, and secondary amines, which are produced when the proteins in meat are degraded during cooking. Studies show that N-nitroso compounds can induce cancer in at least 40 animal species, including humans.

- Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) — PAHs are naturally occurring chemicals produced when coal, gas, wood or tobacco are burned. They also form in meats when meats are grilled or charred. According to studies, activated PAHs can induce multiple mutations in cancer genes that could result in tumor formation.

- Heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCAs) — Like PAHs, HCAs are formed when meats are cooked using high temperature methods like pan frying or grilling. When amino acids, sugars, creatine or creatinine are exposed to high heat (above 300 F), they produce HCAs. These carcinogens also cause DNA damage that can lead to the development of breast, colon, liver, skin, lung and prostate tumors.

- Maillard reactions products (MRPs) — The Maillard reaction, also known as non-enzymatic browning, refers to the chemical reaction that occurs when foods are cooked at high temperatures. Studies show that frying meats promotes the formation of an MRP called acrylamide. This compound is broken down inside the body and forms glacidamide, which causes DNA mutations that can damage the nervous system and trigger cancer development.

- Biogenic amines (BAs) — BAs are nitrogen-containing compounds found in fermented meats like sausages. They are produced through the decarboxylation of amino acids by fermentative bacteria. BAs are the precursors to carcinogenic N-nitrosamines; when present at high levels in food, they can cause headaches, nausea, rashes and unwanted changes in blood pressure.

According to the Spanish researchers, knowledge of these substances and their generation routes is important as it facilitates the assessment of the safety of meat products. It could also help food scientists come up with ways to reduce or eliminate the presence of these substances of concern in meats, making them much safer sources of nutrition.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-11 19:15:33 Why is eating large amounts of processed meat bad for your health? It comes down to the toxic additives and preservatives

The lean component of red meat is an excellent source of essential nutrients. According to a study published in the journal Nutrition & Dietetics, you can get vitamins B2, B3, B5, B6 and B12 from red meat, as well as minerals like iron, phosphorus, selenium and zinc. The lean component of red meat is also a great source of protein and omega-3 fatty acids, which offer significant benefits for your heart and brain. In addition, phytochemical analysis reveals that it is rich in endogenous antioxidants and bioactive components like taurine, carnitine, glutathione and creatine that support overall health.

But despite all of these nutritional benefits, eating large amounts of red meat is still considered unhealthy. This prompted a team of Spanish researchers to investigate why frequent consumption of red meat increases health risks. In their report, which appeared in the journal Food Science and Human Wellness, the researchers attributed its negative effects to the presence of “substances of safety concern” in various meat products. These harmful chemicals are linked to certain food additives and are generated when red meats are subjected to various types of processing.

The dangerous chemicals in red and processed meats

According to numerous studies, there is a clear link between high intake of red and processed meats and an increased risk for heart disease, diabetes, cancer and premature death. Among these negative consequences, cancer is the most commonly associated with diets that include large portions of meat.

In a 2015 report released by the World Health Organization, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified all kinds of red meat (i.e., beef, veal, pork, lamb, mutton, horse and goat) as Group 2A, or probably carcinogenic to humans, and processed meats (e.g., fried, salted, cured, fermented or smoked) as Group 1, or carcinogenic to humans. The IARC based their classification on limited evidence from epidemiological studies for red meat and sufficient evidence for processed meats. Part 1/2. @naomirwolf
Read more Open / Comment

2021-08-10 23:42:50 ​​ Read the beginning of the article
US remains unconvinced of the effectiveness of vitamin D

British Member of Parliament David Davis welcomed the study’s findings at the time of its submission. He tweeted back in February 2021: “This is a very important study on vitamin D and COVID-19. Its findings are incredibly clear.” He further remarked that the study’s conclusion “should result in this therapy being administered to every COVID-19 patient in every hospital.”

A May 2020 statement by the French National Academy of Medicine (ANM) also espoused vitamin D as a “simple and inexpensive measure” against COVID-19. It elaborated: “Vitamin D cannot be considered as a preventive or a curative treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, by mitigating the inflammatory cytokine storm and its consequences, it could be considered as an adjunct to any form of therapy.”

The ANM recommended that COVID-19 patients above 60 years old get tested for vitamin D levels. It advised that the same patients take 50,000 IU to 100,000 IU of vitamin D once the deficiency is confirmed to “help limit respiratory complications.” Furthermore, the ANM suggested that people below 60 years old who test positive for COVID-19 take a daily dose of 800 IU to 1,000 IU of vitamin D.

But in spite of the positive effects of vitamin D on COVID-19 patients, the U.S. has refused to acknowledge its potential as a treatment. The U.S. National Institutes of Health noted that low vitamin D levels “have been associated with an increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia in older adults and children” in observational studies. However, its guidance from April 21 said: “There is insufficient evidence to recommend either for or against the use of vitamin D for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.”

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment