2023-11-15 19:18:43
Here's why this performance was given a
Band 7:"This test taker can speak at length without noticeable effort or loss of
coherence. He does, however, demonstrate some language-related hesitation, repetition and self correction.
He develops topics appropriately, using a range of markers and linking words to give
cohesion (lately; in my opinion; if I’m not wrong; maybe you know; actually).
He has a good
vocabulary and shows some awareness of style and collocation (working for peace; internal problem; people in need; in conflict; a border city) but he sometimes makes the wrong word choices (if I do something very queer; to be in-between everyone).
He has good
grammatical control and produces many error-free sentences, using both simple and complex structures (more easily than before; without being treated differently). However, there are some problems with tenses (they bring instead of ‘they brought’; if I will like to read;
I can be famous instead of ‘I could be famous’; I prefer my privacy instead of ‘I would prefer my privacy’), with articles (they don’t have private life) and with word order (even you can upload).
There are many examples of very natural
pronunciation and he can be easily followed, as he uses intonation and stress to good communicative effect. There are just a few problems with the production of individual sounds but, overall, his accent is slight and has very little impact on intelligibility.
This test taker is a clear example of a
Band 7." @cambridgematerials
18.5K viewsedited 16:18