Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

2021-04-26 14:32:45 On the (dis)information battlefield, misdirection is a tool of war.
Keep the enemy guessing.
Dont lose sight of the goal. Open / Comment

2021-04-26 04:55:38 LAWFARE 101
How to force a judge recusal.

Dont like the judge assigned to your case?

Step 1:
Retain a lawyer who had previously worked with the judge you dislike.

Step 2:
Have your newly retained lawyer file some paperwork with the judge you dislike.

Step 3:
Tell the judge to recuse himself because he now has a conflict of interest. Open / Comment

2021-04-26 04:19:13 Judge recusal forced? Open / Comment

2021-04-26 04:07:55 Open / Comment

2021-04-26 01:26:40 Jovan is involved in the audit and has confirmed that there is no fingerprints check. Open / Comment

2021-04-26 01:24:09 TO ALL LOGICAL THINKERS there is no such thing as scan for fingerprints. Please be aware of all the foolish fake and deepstate attacks. That is all. Open / Comment

2021-04-26 01:12:23 UV light is able to detect fingerprints. I talked with Bobby Piton and we discussed whether the audit team may be looking for fingerprints or not. It was our conclusion that a lack of fingerprints may mean the ballot might have been marked using non-human means.
In such situations, extra scrutiny of the ballot may be wise. Open / Comment

2021-04-25 18:01:46 They are not lifting fingerprints, but a lack of fingerprints might be a sign of a ballot that was not marked by a human. Open / Comment

2021-04-25 17:42:58 Called @BobbyPiton earlier and had a chat about the potential use of the UV light station.
Since UV is able to detect oil from finger prints, if there are no fingerprints on the ballot then the likelihood of the ballot being marked through a non-human process is high.

No finger prints? Scrutinize!

Give @BobbyPiton a follow while you’re at it, he is doing great work with building the phantom voter data sets and corresponding algorithms. Open / Comment

2021-04-25 07:42:25 2 boxes down...alotttt to go Open / Comment