ENTRY - The 'virus mutation' - Since early February, | Corona Investigative
ENTRY
- The "virus mutation" -
Since early February, a whole series of alarming statements about SARS-CoV-2 and its alleged mutations have been circulating in the media.
Two of the most prominent examples are these:
"The mutation from the UK and others will overrun us, the virus has been given a rocket boost."
"This race has long been lost."
Probably just about everyone in Germany knows these quotes, which come from another so-called "corona expert” - one of the "voices of science.” How many experts are there? Nevertheless, the assertions of this “expert," a virologist by profession, have not only been extensively disseminated via many media channels, but have also often been (justifiably) criticised.
How did the idea of viral mutation come about?
In contrast to what is generally expected in science, the existence of viruses is not factually proven in virology. Instead, their existence is considered to be proven solely on the basis of interpreted appearances and conceptual models. Pathogenic viruses are thus nothing more than mere consensus, i.e. an opinion that has been agreed upon in science.
You can learn more about virus evidence in the main program of ImmanuelProject.
The "SARS-CoV-2" virus, in turn, is itself believed to be a mutation of ancient coronavirus strains. This assumption arose from the so-called "sequence alignment" which is considered one of the strongest scientific proofs for the existence of SARS-CoV-2. Sequence alignment is a bioinformatics technique in which fragments of nucleic acid (DNA) are assembled with a computer into a hypothetical strand of genetic material. In order to carry out the alignment, roughly comparable to a jigsaw puzzle, templates in the form of old strands of genetic material are required. In the same way as the picture on the box of a puzzle serves as a template. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, two old corona models were used for this purpose.
Because during the alignment process, large parts of the constructed genome strand are freely invented, and other parts are "tweaked" by the associated computer programs to produce a reasonably credible result, the finished product never looks 100% like the template. It's similar to forcibly putting together puzzle pieces that don't even belong to the original to create a similar image.
=> this (inevitable) deviation to the template is in the end the basis of the entire "mutation" named SARS-CoV-2!
How does one come to the idea that SARS-CoV-2 is supposed to have mutated further?
- - -
Read the entire article "The virus mutation" on our website www.projekt-immanuel.de
