Q Saying 'near significant' instead of 'non-significant' Some | Data Scientology
Q Saying 'near significant' instead of 'non-significant'
Some studies write 'near significant results' when they have a value of p>0.06 or p>0.07, instead of saying that they just got non-significant result, and then they run a post-hoc [even though results were not statistically significant\] is this acceptable?
