🔥 Burn Fat Fast. Discover How! 💪

Fides et Gens

Logo of telegram channel fidesetgens — Fides et Gens F
Logo of telegram channel fidesetgens — Fides et Gens
Channel address: @fidesetgens
Categories: Politics
Language: English
Subscribers: 1.95K
Description from channel

Faith and Folk.
Part of @OWLM_Network

Ratings & Reviews

3.00

2 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

1

4 stars

0

3 stars

0

2 stars

0

1 stars

1


The latest Messages 91

2021-10-19 02:54:32
RIP to our great Commander Lee

Who passed away on this day, October 12, 1870.

Deo Vindice
322 views23:54
Open / Comment
2021-10-19 00:02:21
@FidesEtGens
560 views21:02
Open / Comment
2021-10-18 21:01:54
@FidesEtGens
883 views18:01
Open / Comment
2021-10-18 18:05:28 Are Our Views On Salvation Different From The Churches?
(Specifically on beneficiaries)

No they aren't. There is no difference theologically between our views and the standard views of the Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox, etc, churches.
It is held by all Churches, and it also scripturally sound, that the opportunity for salvation is with Adamic life alone. This is why you hear from Church that fauna and flora don't go to heaven, because they are not Adamic life.

However there is one difference between us, not theologically, but with the identification of Adamic life itself.

Churches today arbitrarily identify Adam as the most recent common ancestor of all living homonids. A socially constructed, ahistorical claim with no basis in scripture; conforming to the modern ideas of humanism we see plaguing our academic community today.

An example of this arbitrary proclamation is with, "Y-chromosomal" Adam, defined as "the patrilineal most recent common ancestor from whom all currently living humans are descended". A definition socially constructed to be just broad enough to include all hominids today.

The Church today identifies Adamic life identically to this, which excludes extinct hominids based purely on that metric, but would include them if they were alive; making Adamic life completely subjective to them. Which is a nonsensical way to define Adamic life; as Adam was a man with descendants, thus Adamic life is objective.

So what would happen if we were to instead identify Adamic life objectively with scripture and anthropology? The way it was meant to be:
—You would find that Adamic life would be solely identified as Caucasian.
—Leaving the opportunity for salvation with Caucasians alone (this isn't the only requirement).
—Specifically the only remaining pure Caucasians, Europeans and their diaspora (Whites).

This identification isn't a doctrine unique to a particular denomination, but is a fundamental truth, impacting all Christians. The implication of which is:
Only Whites can be Catholic.
Only Whites can be Orthodox.
Only Whites can be Protestant.

and so on.

The very reality of Christianity is simple:
Only Whites can be Christian, and we must safeguard both our faith and race from the dark foreign hordes.
170 views15:05
Open / Comment
2021-10-18 18:02:00
@FidesEtGens
578 views15:02
Open / Comment
2021-10-18 15:02:26
@FidesEtGens
932 views12:02
Open / Comment
2021-10-18 14:01:52
@FidesEtGens
559 views11:01
Open / Comment
2021-10-17 21:02:00
@FidesEtGens
122 views18:02
Open / Comment
2021-10-17 20:13:03
Founder's Building dome, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom

@ThisIsEuropa
104 views17:13
Open / Comment
2021-10-17 18:01:58
@FidesEtGens
237 views15:01
Open / Comment