“Reconciliation” There are some key take-always from my analy | Follow the Data with Dr Frank

“Reconciliation”

There are some key take-always from my analyses of state elections and voter rolls.

1) The numbers in the voter rolls do not reconcile with the official state reports, 10% errors are common;

2) The numbers in the voter rolls are manipulated by computer algorithms, making them highly predictable;

3) The voter rolls are not static; they are continuously in flux. Since election officials typically do not regularly back these up (archived snapshots) it provides a fertile environment for hiding election fraud;

4) To expose this situation, I typically ask election officials to provide a list of everyone who voted in the November 2020 election. It is shocking (and illegal) that our officials are incapable of answering this most basic of questions;

5) Voter registration rolls typically grow faster than the population growth, and county records in many states move synchronously, demonstrating that they are being centrally manipulated;

6) Since the databases are continuously in flux, one person’s analysis may differ than someone else’s because they are starting from different source data. This does not invalidate a particular analysis... in fact, it exposes a major flaw in the system.

How simple it would be to simply have a paper poll book... with one page per person. The problem with this is that politicians would have less access to the voter rolls, and cheaters would have less ability to cheat.

Wait... isn’t that what we want?