'Critics' I find it pitiful that critics of my work still don | Follow the Data with Dr Frank

"Critics"

I find it pitiful that critics of my work still don't get it, despite months of explanations in dozens of videos and presentations.

Essentially, criticisms fall into three categories:
1) My data are incorrect;
2) My analyses are incorrect;
3) My analysis does not expose any fraud.

1) First, they are are not my data. I am downloading official data from official state websites. The fact that the state does does not reconcile with itself is one of the main points I am making. The fact that the data are always in flux is also a substantial factor. Before someone pops off, they need to recognize that the data they are downloading today is not the same data that was available soon after the elections.

2) Two plus two always equals four. If you don't think my analyses are correct, do them yourself and show us your different results. At least a dozen people around the country have done the hard work and confirmed that what I have been saying is true. Of course, I can make mistakes, and appreciate it when people point them out.

3) If I show that a county has more people registered to vote in it than there are people, that raises important concerns. When we then do canvassing and discover the phantom voters, that exposes fraud. When the state's own records show more votes than ballots, that raises important concerns. When we then do canvassing and discover the phantom voters, that exposes fraud. When a state is unable to produce a list of everyone who voted in an election, that raises important concerns. Etc, etc...

My motto is, "Follow the Data."

The data demonstrate important anomalies. The statistics suggest massive and widespread fraud has taken place. The canvassing confirms the anomalies and the statistics.

Need I say more?