AN OVERVIEW OF DAY 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT A few highlights f | Juliana Priya
AN OVERVIEW OF DAY 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT
A few highlights for me personally have been in the great work the applicants or “the peoples”
legal team have produced.
POINTS INCLUDE :
That NO WEIGHT should be given concerning the states “expert”evidence, to due to a number of factors;
The States experts are not “independent” experts.
Deputy Chief Health Officer, Dr Marianne Gale is a paid employee of the NSW Government.
Professor Macartney and the organisation’s she represents have received more than 65 million dollars from the State in recent years.
The “people’s” legal team left the judge with no doubt that the States “experts” lacked “expertise” in the area of “Covid”.
It was clearly stated in evidence that Professor Macartney does NOT or has NEVER worked with Covid patients.
Professor Macartney dismissed alternate medicines and treatments that are being used overseas with great success, although she has not been involved or conducted any research or testing herself regarding these treatments.
It was pointed out to the judge that Professor Macartney had stated that “the jab” was “safe” for pregnant women.
THIS STATEMENT IS UNTRUE.
In fact the “vaccine” manufacturer and the WHO ( World Health Organisation) state that very little data is available to assess vaccine safety in pregnancy.
The “people’s” legal team also brought forward the “vaccine” manufacturers own data regarding adverse effects and the information on the governments own TGA website revealing the adverse effects.
Studies on safety and efficacy are still ongoing
Only limited data is available on safety & efficacy.
Risks have not been established
Data is insufficient
ALL RISKS MUST BE KNOWN IN ORDER TO GIVE INFORMED CONSENT
The “people’s” legal team also brought forward the efficacy ( meaning its ability to produce an intended result) of “the jab”.
The question was stated Why aren’t the “jabs” giving a high efficacy?
Why are they not 100% effective in the area of protection and transmission?
The current “jabs” were manufactured to target ONLY the FIRST variant, NOT the current “Delta” Variant therefore questioning the efficacy of the “vaccine “ against the “Delta” variant. The “first” variant has disappeared as the virus has evolved into the Delta variant.
It was also stated that those who took the jab were 30 more times of getting the virus then those who did not.
A preliminary study has shown that in the case of a breakthrough infection, the Delta variant is able to grow in the noses of vaccinated people to the same degree as if they were not vaccinated at all.
The virus that grows is just as infectious as that in unvaccinated people, meaning vaccinated people can transmit the virus and infect others.
The points above are simply MY “overview” from some of the many points noted from this mornings proceedings in the Supreme Court with Justice Richard Cavanagh.
Court has now resumed....For your information
JK KIRK SC is the lead for the law team representing the State Government.
Watch
