NY Times World posted a tweet saying that “Russian attacks kil | Russian MFA 🇷🇺

NY Times World posted a tweet saying that “Russian attacks killed at least 19 people” but they were not “as deadly as could have been”. This somehow “renewed the questions of quality” of Russian weapons. So, NY Times doubted the quality of Russian weapons because not enough people were killed. Truly sadistic logic. We wonder if NY Times applies the same criteria to evaluate US weaponry. Well, US invasion in Iraq alone claimed lives of around 1 million civilians. Is this the “quality” you speak of, NY Times?

Link to NY Times Global tweet