$NASDUCK runs as a Telegram mini-app points game built around a duck mascot, and the channel exists to funnel members into that app rather than to inform them about a token or a protocol. Nearly every post is the same call to action: open the linked bot, watch a short video, find a code hidden in it, and submit that code for points. Variety comes only from which partner is bundled into the task of the day — Jivopets and ZenCoin both show up as cross-promotion targets, folded into the same "watch and find the code" format used for the channel's own tasks.
There is no discussion here of what the points convert into, whether $NASDUCK is a listed token or a points system waiting for one, or how the game economy is meant to work beyond "collect points, get extra points." One post celebrates approaching a round number of participants ("the MILLIONth") and frames growth itself as the goal, which fits the pattern: engagement and referral, not disclosure.
The one substantive announcement in the whole set says the platform is going in for "revision" to come back better, and the channel has stayed quiet since — no follow-up task, no relaunch notice, nothing to close the loop it opened. For a channel whose entire content model is a recurring task cadence, that kind of silence after a "we'll be back" post is a meaningful signal about whether the project is actually still maintained.
As a review target, this channel gives almost nothing to evaluate beyond the mechanic itself: it is a repetitive task-and-points loop with no visible roadmap, no tokenomics, and no update since it paused for reworking. It might interest someone already holding points who wants to know if a task dropped, but it is not a place to learn what $NASDUCK actually is or whether the project delivers on what it promises.
N
