National Bolshevik Ideology

2021-07-15 04:16:27 "The way of the future involves bringing together the man of the Right with the man of the Left”

https://arplan.org/2020/07/04/right-or-left-zehrer/ Open / Comment

2021-07-13 20:05:08 "Revolutionary nationalism is anti-fascist because fascism, aside from its racially-alien characteristics [fremdvölkischen Zügen], does not understand how to incorporate the leadership of the proletariat; in its economic order is only a reform of capitalism; and in its corporatist state-form is a camouflaged dictatorship over the working Volk which thereby perpetuates the division of the nation into ruler and ruled."

- Karl Otto Paetel Open / Comment

2021-07-13 00:15:02 So left, two, three!
So left, two, three!
To the work that we must do.
March on in the workers' United Front,
for you are a worker too!

And just because he's a worker,
no class can free him but his own.
The emancipation of the working class
is the task of the worker alone. Open / Comment

2021-07-09 22:12:24 Though China does not officially have a fully nationalized central bank, it is interesting to note that the Chinese Private Central Bank is heavily regulated by a body of the state called "The State Council of the People's Republic of China". Even more impressive is the level of control the state has over the bank. It has members of the state in various positions within the bank who are simultaneously members of the CCP.

This puts the central bank in a basic "de-facto nationalized state" where it is only but a few degrees away from official nationalization. When it comes to international finance, China still is part of the world financial system, however, the state is operating from a position of strength and not a position of weakness unlike liberal democratic states such as the United States where the state is subject to the Federal Reserve. Open / Comment

2021-07-09 18:10:42 Open / Comment

2021-07-08 03:52:11 "Avente per simbolo l'aquila prussiana con al centro una falce e martello, il movimento nazionalbolscevico, destinato a superare la dicotomia destra-sinistra, si proponeva di recuperare la sovranità della Germania, perduta appunto con il Trattato di Versailles, attraverso un'alleanza con la Russia bolscevica di Lenin e con il Partito Comunista Tedesco (KPD).

Contrapposto alla visione liberale, borghese, illuminista e capitalista propugnata dalla Rivoluzione Francese del 1789, asse portante delle nazioni capitaliste occidentali, il nazionalbolscevismo vedeva nella Rivoluzione d'Ottobre del 1917 il suo punto di riferimento, fondato sul primato della comunità e dell'operaio-proletario al servizio della stessa, rispetto all'egoismo dell'"homo economicus" della borghesia capitalista, la quale pensava unicamente al proprio egoistico tornaconto personale.

I nazionalbolscevichi proponevano dunque l'unità della classe operaia e proletaria in chiave nazionale e antiborghese in alleanza all'Unione Sovietica e a tutte le potenze oppresse dal colonialismo economico occidentale. In tal senso i nazionalbolscevichi si contrapposero altresì al nazismo hitleriano e al fascismo, sia per il carattere antisemita di tali ideologie, che in quanto vedevano in esse la prosecuzione della politica capitalista, borghese, imperialista e antisovietica. Tali critiche saranno formulate in particolare da Niekisch nei suoi saggi, pubblicati negli Anni '30: "Hitler - una fatalità tedesca" e "Il Regno dei Demoni" (ripubblicati recentemente da NovaEuropa e sarà mia cura recensirli prossimamente), che gli costeranno successivamente l'internamento in un campo di concentramento dal quale uscirà solo a guerra finita, nel 1945, liberato dalle tuppe sovietiche e successivamente aderirà al Partito Comunista Tedesco della nascente DDR."

http://amoreeliberta.blogspot.com/2018/09/pugni-proletari-e-baionette-prussiane.html Open / Comment

2021-07-06 21:35:48 Open / Comment

2021-07-06 00:05:44 Based Nazbol leader getting complained about... Again

https://mobile.twitter.com/AmichaiStein1/status/1412142831314014208 Open / Comment

2021-07-04 16:37:01 Ernst Niekisch is, alongside Karl Otto Paetel, one of the better-known names from Weimar Germany’s National-Bolshevist intellectual milieu (although, somewhat ironically, Niekisch apparently never actually self-identified as a ‘National Bolshevik’). Niekisch is a particularly interesting figure because, throughout his life, he ran the gamut from far-left to far-right and back again. Beginning his career as a Social-Democratic Party (SPD) activist and short-lived leader of Munich’s post-War revolutionary government, Niekisch eventually drifted by way of a number of social-democratic groups into a position of influence as a national-revolutionary intellectual, before finally ending up back in the Marxist camp following WWII as a member of East Germany’s Socialist Unity Party. The short essay below is from 1926, a significant transitional period in Niekisch’s life. Disillusioned with the tactics and theory of social-democracy, in July 1926 Niekisch resigned his SPD membership, founded his own theoretical journal (Widerstand, i.e. ‘Resistance’), and became editor of the Volkstaat, the party newspaper of the Old Social-Democratic Party of Saxony (ASP). The ASP had been founded two months prior due to factional disputes between the conservative and radical wings of the SPD’s Saxon branch, with the conservatives forming the ASP and inviting Niekisch to take charge of their newspaper and the new party’s ideological direction. The article below should thus be viewed in this context, with Niekisch defending his new journal Widerstand and his own personal views against charges of “social reaction” and “nationalistic obscurantism” from mainstream social-democrats, who would have been particularly concerned about potential competition from a new political rival. As it turned out the ASP ended up performing poorly in subsequent elections and Niekisch resigned his party membership in 1928, completely disillusioned with electoral politics altogether and now completely convinced that Germany’s salvation could only come about through organizing a militant, nationalistic counter-movement to parliamentarism. Widerstand, which remained in publication until its ban in 1934, served as the vehicle for its editor’s increasingly apocalyptic worldview, reflecting his call for a radical new nationalist-socialist ethos which would sweep away every last vestige of bourgeois civilization in alliance with the “barbaric”, “primitive” Prussianism emanating from the East – the Soviet Union.

https://arplan.org/2020/08/03/ernst-niekisch-where-we-stand/ Open / Comment