2021-04-30 05:14:25
Covid-1984 and PCR...
Create Faulty “Covid” PCR Test:“without having virus material available,”^1
“...relying instead on the Chinese scientists’ genetic sequence published on the internet.” ^2
“Dr. Pieter Borger said, **”The virus wasn’t in Europe and the paper was already finished.”** He said these facts “should have been on television long ago. I explained it on LinkedIn, but you get banned if you do.” **Regarding PCR he said, “You are not detecting a virus.”** ^2, ^3
Asymptomatic, Anyone? ”...in nearly all test procedures worldwide,
merely 2 primer matches were used instead of all three. This oversight renders the
entire test-protocol useless with regards to delivering accurate test-results” ^1, ^2, ^3, ^4, ^5, ^6, ^7, ^8, ^9, ^10, ^11, ^12, ^13, ^14, ^15, ^16, ^17, ^18, ^19
“...if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of
35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%,
the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%” ^1
*NY Times Reports:*
”Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37...” ^6
”Tests with
thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that
pose no particular risk”Any test with
a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside.
”I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said.”
Fauci: PCR Cycle ThresholdHere is an excerpt from
Fauci’s key quote [starting about the 4-minute mark](
)
“…If you get a
cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…**it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”** ^10
”It is
spreading like fire,” Abbi told NBC News by phone... none of them had really serious symptoms. In fact,
they all seem to be asymptomatic.” ^11
BBC: “Majority testing positive have no symptoms” ^12
“Anyone who’s studied infectious diseases knows that
a PCR test cannot be used to diagnose anything. [A PCR test is a lab test that MAY be used to SUPPORT a diagnosis.”](https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ZnpnBYgGARE)
-Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi
”Dr. Corbett, a Ph.D., and retired RN elaborated:“There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper. Public Health England is a co-author on it. All the public health authorities across the EU have co-authored this paper. But here is the bottom line:
There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn’t correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it ‘donut ring science.’ There is nothing at the center of it.
It’s all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality, or the actual person, the patient.” ^2, ^1
I read him some of the critiques from the other side, that say it’s been isolated “all over the world.”
”Yes, there have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The
CDC produced a paper in July, I think it was, where they said: ‘Here’s the viral isolate.’ Do you know what they did?
They swabbed one person. One person, who’d been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they
assumed he had it to begin with. So
it’s all full of holes, the whole thing.”*Kary Mullis, PCR Inventor:*
”With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe, in sort of the Buddhist notion, that everything is contained in everything else, right? I mean, if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then **there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body, okay.
75 views02:14
C
