The end of the Sussmann trial was disappointing because a DC j | QT

The end of the Sussmann trial was disappointing because a DC jury decided to ignore all the evidence.

They were pulled from a population of the Swamp that believes Durham is on a witch hunt and that his investigation should have been ended by Merrick Garland over a year and a half ago.

Ah well!

Onto the next battle: the Danchenko case in Virginia.

The case of an actual real life honest-to-God Russian intelligence officer who fled the US in 2010 just ahead of a FISA warrant after an espionage case was opened against him. Danchenko got caught soliciting the theft of classified information in exchange for payment. You know the kind of thing undercover Russian intelligence officers do.

That espionage case was still open when Danchenko returned to the US sometime prior to 2016, when turns up as Christopher Steele's primary source for the fake dossier.

The FBI knew Danchenko was a Russian intelligence asset. And yet...

And yet...they accepted dossier allegations from Steele that they knew Danchenko was the source for.

Allegations that were used to get a FISA warrant on an American citizen named Carter Page.

See, the FBI used what they knew were allegations from a suspected Russian agent named Danchenko to get a surveillance warrant on a suspected Russian agent named Carter Page, so they could launch an investigation of the Trump campaign to determine if Trump and Michael Flynn and others were also Russian agents.

None of this is speculation.

Everything I just told you was declassified and became public record long ago.

It's when Durham presents it as evidence in court that many more people are suddenly going to become aware of all of this.