I do not use polling in my assessments. I think if they’re too | Seth spare

I do not use polling in my assessments. I think if they’re too widely cast, they become unreliable. Some folks like Richard Baris can give you good info that confirms or denies your suspicions on a particular place, and it may get stored in the back on my mind.

Polling numbers about sentiment are much more accurate because it doesn’t force people to declare allegiance to candidates and parties. For instance, I find the Rasmussen number of 51% of Americans believe the election to be fraudulent, to be an accurate assessment. That will be 65-70% if Arizona and GA are confirmed ugly through audits.

On other numbers - you’ve surely seen the ones suggesting 70% of Americans are against illegal immigration and awarding perks to those here illegally, or the numbers that support gun ownership or banning boys from competing in girls sports... most of our issues are indeed favored in society, and by huge amounts.

The news from NYC the other night to me confirms my suspicions even further. How is it that mega blue counties go 80/20 Democrat and 90/10 in the urban core with numbers like you see on the sentiment polls? Maybe because for many years illegitimate “test” ballots or other fake votes are piled on and are always there to ensure no power changes hands?

Better yet, why no forensic audits requested by Clinton/DNC in 2016 when losing MI, PA, WI by narrow margins? Would be a shame if those audits found several hundred thousand fake votes piled in Detroit, Ann Arbor, Philly, Madison, Pitt, and Milwaukee for all these years since the nonsense red state-blue state divide began.

Makes sense why most of the conversations you find yourself in end in head nods about how crazy the left is, almost no matter where you go.