This is unbelievably disingenuous.
Obviously there is a difference between a constituent calling a congressional office to lobby for a cause they personally believe in (what Ben describes)...
Versus a paid member of an organization being assigned to a congressman to ensure that he sticks to the narrative so they continue to receive funding (what Massie has described AIPAC handlers do).
AIPAC is a lobbying organization that represents a foreign nation, and funds or targets members of Congress based on their loyalty to said foreign nation.
If you support that, just say it.
