Get Mystery Box with random crypto!

Theology bites

Logo of telegram channel theologybites — Theology bites T
Logo of telegram channel theologybites — Theology bites
Channel address: @theologybites
Categories: Education
Language: English
Subscribers: 69
Description from channel

A channel on theology and science- an academic look. Exploring the cultures, traditions and ideas of them in depth. Interesting books, articles and documentaries will be posted. Subscribe!

Ratings & Reviews

3.50

2 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

1

3 stars

1

2 stars

0

1 stars

0


The latest Messages

2021-07-31 12:19:22 @oyon7
35 views09:19
Open / Comment
2021-07-31 12:19:17 @farhan
33 views09:19
Open / Comment
2020-06-28 08:46:10 Facts
177 views05:46
Open / Comment
2019-07-17 07:27:08


|| The Goal of the Shari'āh is Justice, Not Equality ||


In speaking of justice, many well-intended Muslims are unconsciously secularised. For their discourse about justice (Ar. ‘adl, qist) is so often scarred by failing to grasp its Qur'ānic essence: ‘To put a thing in its rightful place.’¹ Which is to say, justice is to give things their proper due – at the due time, the due place, and in due measure.

This requires possessing knowledge about the value and measure of things, as Islām assigns to them, so as to give them their due. ‘Hence,’ Ibn al-Qayyim wrote, ‘knowledge and justice are the root of every good, while injustice and ignorance are the root of every evil.’²

The Qur'ānic insistence on justice can be found in many verses, like: ‘God commands you to render back things held in trust to their rightful owners, and if you judge between people, that you judge justly.’ [Q.4:58] And also: ‘O you who believe! Be upright for justice, witnesses to God, even if it be against yourselves, or parents, or relatives; and weather it be against rich or poor.’ [Q.4:135]

But talking more from a marketable take on Islām than a textual, well-studied one, they mistakenly equate justice ( ‘adl) with equality ( musawa). This though isn’t really Islām’s story. No doubt, there are areas of overlap between the two. But the Qur'ān is couched in the language of justice, not equality. To describe Islām as ‘egalitarian’, or to claim it advocates equality isn’t just reductionist, the concepts are also not very meaningful. While some verses of the Qur'ān do have an egalitarian temper to them, many others insist on difference, distinction and divine disparity.

While speaking about the disbelievers who harm and transgress against their own souls because of their disbelief, the Qur'ān asks: ‘Is he who is a believer like he who transgresses? They are not equal.’ [Q.32:18] We also read: ‘Not equal are the people of the Fire and the people of the Garden. It is the people of the Garden that are the [true] winners.’ [Q.59:20] Then there are verses which speak to gender roles, functions and natures: ‘And the male is not like the female.’ [Q.3:36]

And as Islām legally obligated men to financially maintain family and household, while women do not have any such duty, there’s this verse: ‘God thus commands you concerning [the division of inheritance for] your children: to the male a share equal to that of two females.’ [Q.4:11]

All this is to say that the Qur'ān speaks of justice, not the nebulous social construct of equality. It’s when we veer away from using the vocabulary of the Qur'ān, using instead ill-informed substitutes, that distortions or deviations creep in to corrupt the Qur'ānic message. Of all the modern voices guilty of conflating justice with equality, feminism takes first prize.

To conclude: highlighting the core nature of the Shari'āh, Imām Ibn al-Qayyim says that justice is its essential feature. He wrote: ‘Indeed, [God] transcendent is He, has clarified in the paths He legislates that its purpose is: to establish justice among His servants and equity between people. Thus any path by which justice and equity are drawn out is part of the religion, and can never be in opposition to it.’³

Elsewhere he says: ‘The Shari'āh is based on and built on wisdom and [achieving] public welfare, in this life and in the next. It is justice in its entirety, mercy in its entirety, welfare in its entirety, and wisdom in its entirety. Any issue which departs from justice to injustice, or mercy to its opposite, or public welfare to corruption, or wisdom to folly can’t be part of the shari‘ah, even if it is claimed to be so due to some interpretation.’

Footnotes:

1. Al-Raghīb Mufradāt Alfāz al-Qur'ān (Beirut: Dar al-Qalam, 2002), 537.
2. Madārij al-Salikīn (Riyadh: Dar Taybah, 2008), 4:556.
3. Al-Tūrūq al-Hukmiyyah (Makkah: Dar ‘Alam al-Fawa’id, 2007), 31.
4. I‘lam al-Muwaqqīn (Riyadh: Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 2002), 4:337.


------
Tags: #Shariah #Law #Secularism
118 views04:27
Open / Comment
2019-05-17 07:56:34


|| What Everyone Needs To Know About Shari'āh ||


Watch Andrew F. March, a specialist on Islām and Political Science at University of Massachusetts, and also a visiting scholar with the Middle East Initiative in the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, explain everything you always wanted to know about Shari'āh but were afraid to ask.

Source: Creeping Sharia? What You Need to Know.,Emir-Stein Center, YouTube

Tap the link Preview below


Read the previous post here

--------------------------------------
Tags: #Shariah #Law
64 views04:56
Open / Comment
2019-05-13 19:44:28


|| What Everyone Needs To Know About Shari'āh ||


Does Islāmic law permit or encourage terrorism or suicide bombing?

Under no circumstances is suicide, let alone suicidal terrorism and bombing, permitted in Islāmic law. The Qur'ānic prohibition against killing (al-An’ām, 6:151) and suicide ( “And kill yourselves not [la taqtulu anfusakum], for God is merciful to you” – al-Nisa’, 4:29) is supported by various sayings of the Prophet ﷺ. Elsewhere the Qur'ān addresses the believers to “throw not yourselves into the mouth of danger,” (al-Baqarah, 2:195) be it out of despair, ignorance or adventurism. These prohibitions subsume all forms of violence and self-destruction, including suicide bombing.

The exquisite and illuminating juristic edict against terrorism perpetrated on civilians written by the eminent Sunni jurist, philologist, philosopher and theologian based in Oxford University Sheikh Dr. Muhammad Afifi al-Akiti titled 'Defending the Transgressed by Censuring the Reckless against the Killing of Civilians' has clearly stated that Suicide bombings are unislāmic. So have many other Scholars in numerous books, talks, articles etc. Acknowledging this fact, Juan Carlos Antunez and Dr. Ioannis Tellidis of the Department of International Studies, Kyung Hee University writes:

"Many Muslim scholars have attributed Islam's association with terrorism to ignorance among Muslims (al-Atharee, in Silber and Bhatt 2007, 13), misunderstanding (DeLong Bas 2004, 278-279) and sometimes insincere research and even deliberate misleading (al-Jazaa'iree, in Spechard 2011, 9-2) by different Western interests and agendas. They have made statements that affirm terrorism is in violation of Sharia law and aids the enemies of Islam (Silber and Bhatt 2007; Salafipublications 2003). Numerous fatwas (an Islamic scholar's authoritative legal opinion) condemning suicide bombing as haram (legal term for what is forbidden or inviolable under Islamic Law) have been published by Islamic scholars worldwide. According to them, terrorism must be condemned without any excuses or pretexts: "They [terrorists] can't claim that their suicide bombings are martyrdom operations and that they become heroes of the Muslim Umma. No, they become heroes of hellfire, and they are leading towards hellfire." (Casciani 2010)."

Source: Antunez, J. C. & Tellidis, I. (2014). The power of words: the deficient terminology surrounding Islam-related terrorism. in Harmonie Toros & Ioannis Tellidis (eds), Terrorism, Peace and Conflict Studies. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 123


Read the previous post here

--------------------------------------
Tags: #Shariah #Law
50 views16:44
Open / Comment
2019-05-01 20:51:37

|| The Hijāb ||

The word "hijāb" appears seven times in the Qur'ān. In 7:46, the hijāb is a "barrier" that divides Paradise from the Fire. In 19:16-17, Mary "secludes" herself from her family to devote herself to God in solitude. In 33:53, a "screen" protects the Prophet's wives from onlookers. In 41:5, a "barrier" prevents the disbelievers from heartfelt belief. In 42:51, a "veil" prevents Allāh from being seen by those He reveals to. In 17:45, a "partition" prevents the disbelievers from comprehending the Qur'ān. In 38:32, a "curtain" prevents Solomon from seeking his prescribed prayers.

The Qur'ān never refers to the Muslim headdress as a Hijāb. In our traditional literature, the garment is instead referred to as a khimar, a jilbab, or a kisa'. So this begs the question: what is a hijāb in Islāmic terminology?


Read more by tapping the Instant View below


If you have read the article, please vote by tapping button



Article
38 views17:51
Open / Comment
2019-04-21 16:47:34


|| What Everyone Needs To Know About Shari'āh ||


Do Muslims want to impose Shari'āh law in the West?

Muslim communities in the West have practiced parts of the Shari'āh pertaining to worship matters, matrimonial law and victuals, and have also often expressed the wish to practice more of the Shari'āh in personal law matters, but there is no public demand on their part or that of the majority Muslim countries for Shari'āh to be imposed in the West. Following the advent of Islāmic revivalism, Muslims in the West have become more widely observant of Islāmic principles in personal lifestyle matters, food, clothing etc., but in the public sphere they have, on the whole, followed the laws and customs of their country of domicile. This is also in keeping with the Islāmic position which requires them to observe those laws and customs as law-abiding citizens, provided they do not contradict Islāmic religious injunctions.


Read the previous post here

--------------------------------------
Tags: #Shariah #Law
32 views13:47
Open / Comment
2019-02-12 20:31:30


|| Which Jesus do you believe in? ||

by Ibn Anwar, BHsc (Hons), MCollT


Reading the four gospels with a careful eye to detail will reveal to the discerning reader four blatantly different pictures of the "Lord" that, without disingenuous convoluted harmonising tactics of the fundamentalist, underscores the message of Islām that the Christians had hijacked the real Jesus and made him into their own image. Let us sample an example of how Jesus' image was contrived in the canonical gospels below by ancient, nameless, Christian propagandists.

Did Jesus heal 'many' or 'all' of them? You decide!

"That evening after sunset the people brought to Jesus all the sick and demon-possessed. The whole town gathered at the door, and Jesus healed many who had various diseases. He also drove out many demons, but he would not let the demons speak because they knew who he was." (Mark 1:32-34)

In the Markan version of the incident above, which happens to be the oldest, the sick and the ailing were all brought to Jesus and though many (verse 34) were miraculously healed by Jesus' touch, not every person was lucky enough to be given that gift. This fact is revealed by Mark's use of "all" and "many". According to Mark, although all the sick were brought to Jesus, only 'many' of them were healed.

Using Mark as a source, Matthew revamps the story and creates a greater Jesus in his version of the same event.

"When evening came, many who were demon-possessed were brought to him, and he drove out the spirits with a word and healed all the sick." (Matthew 8:16)

The Markan Jesus healed "many" of all the sick that were brought to him and though the average reader may find that amazing, it didn't sit too well with Matthew as he was writing his own gospel, while cribbing Mark as a source. The Matthean Jesus has him heal literally every sick person that was presented to him. Matthew's Jesus is clearly a more developed person with greater power. Noting this point, Professor in the Religion department at Carleton University, Dr. Zeba Crook in a debate with Richard Carrier says:

“Here is a summary story in which Mark is summarising all the great things that Jesus has been doing. And Mark tells us that they brought him all who were sick and he healed many. That's pretty subtle but still, Matthew has a problem with it and he switches the quantities. Very simple, but it clearly has the same effect. Matthew's Jesus is bigger, better and stronger than Mark's Jesus” [1]

Which Jesus is your Jesus?



Notes:

Atheism TV. (2014, May 10). Jesus of Nazareth: Man or myth? A discussion with Zeba Crook and Richard Carrier. [Video File]. Retrieved from here



----------------------------------------------
Tags: #Christianity #Jesus
21 views17:31
Open / Comment
2019-01-18 20:32:21 Theology bites pinned «I believe that the more thoroughly science is studied, the further does it take us from anything comparable to atheism.” “If you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God.” —Lord William Kelvin, who was noted for his…»
17:32
Open / Comment