Get Mystery Box with random crypto!

Astro Wonders

Logo of telegram channel thewonderofspace — Astro Wonders A
Logo of telegram channel thewonderofspace — Astro Wonders
Channel address: @thewonderofspace
Categories: Education
Language: English
Subscribers: 3.65K
Description from channel

🌌 This channel is all about Astronomy. In this channel we provide you with the information related to Astronomy and Physics
🌌 For further any doubts about the posts in the channel you can join our discussion group.
🌌 Contact Us:

Ratings & Reviews

3.00

2 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

1

4 stars

0

3 stars

0

2 stars

0

1 stars

1


The latest Messages

2022-08-30 21:19:40
Precession is a phenomenon in which the moment of momentum of a body changes its direction in space.

@thewonderofspace
153 views18:19
Open / Comment
2022-08-30 18:18:24 Awesome Channels On Telegram!


➨ Astronomy With Fun
➨ Lost in our thoughts
➨ Logical and funny thinking
➨ Best Feelings
➨ Discover New Facts
➨ Zodiac Facts
➨ Wholesome Brands
➨ Exquisite Pictures
➨ Room Of Vibes
▰▱▰▱▰▱
➨ Riddling World
➨ Astronomy Facts
➨ Mastermind Mods
➨ Astro-Mechanics
➨ BioChemistry Science
➨ Hilarious Memes
➨ The Wonder Of Space
➨ Hare Krishna
▰▱▰▱▰▱
➨ Weird Thoughts
➨ Science Matrix
➨ Funny Marvel Memes
➨ Facts World!
➨ Cosmology and Quantum Mechanics
➨ Quotes Arena
➨ World of knowledge

2hrs on top, 8hrs in channel!
140 views15:18
Open / Comment
2022-08-30 16:37:06 Why pummeled planets may be promising abodes for alien life

Cosmic impacts can make planets and moons more porous than previously thought, potentially boosting their ability to host life, a new study finds.

Our moon's pockmarked surface is a testament to just how often cosmic impacts strike the planets, moons and other major bodies within the solar system. The cracks and pores that result from such pummeling can theoretically host water and potentially even microbial life.

In 2012, NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) spacecraft revealed that the crust of the moon is much less dense, and therefore more porous, than previously thought. The uppermost 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) of lunar highland crust is about 12% empty space, and down to depths of about 12 miles (20 km), the lunar crust still has a porosity of about 4%, the mission determined.

This deep porosity has proven difficult for scientists to explain. Most current models of the moon can only explain high porosity near the lunar surface or within major craters.

In the new study, researchers developed computer simulations of the way cosmic impacts can fracture and generate porosity within lunar and Martian crust, as well as that of Earth. They found that giant collisions may have major effects on the surfaces and structures of those bodies, even very far away from the point of impact and deep into planets or moons.

The new findings help solve the mysterious lunar porosity that GRAIL uncovered.

"This is the first work that really shows that large impacts are capable of fracturing the moon's crust and introducing this porosity," study co-author Brandon Johnson, a planetary scientist at Purdue University in Indiana, said in a statement.

"Our simulations indicate impacts that produce 100- to 1,000-kilometer [60 to 660 miles] scale basins alone are capable of producing all observed porosity within the lunar crust," states the new study's abstract, which you can find at the same site as the above statement. "Simulations under the higher surface gravity of Mars and Earth suggest basin-forming impacts can be a primary source of porosity and fracturing of ancient planetary crusts."

By understanding where and why planets and moons have fractured, scientists may get a better idea about where to best look for life on distant worlds, the researchers said.

"This research has implications for the early Earth and for Mars," study lead author Sean Wiggins, a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue, said in the same statement.

"If life existed back then, there were these intermittently big impacts that would sterilize the planet and boil off the oceans," Wiggins added. "But if you had life that could survive in pores and interstices a few hundred feet or even a few miles down, it could have survived. They could have provided these refuges where life could hide out from these kinds of impacts."

@thewonderofspace
193 views13:37
Open / Comment
2022-08-30 16:29:17 Trio of solar flares produce radio blackouts and dazzling auroras

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/x0LU0OEB

The sun continues to display a flurry of activity.

Space weather watchers observed a series of powerful solar flares between Saturday (Aug. 27) and Monday (Aug. 29), the most powerful of which registered as an M8-class flare and occurred on Monday at 7:07 a.m. EDT (1207 GMT), SpaceWeather.com reports. M-class flares are typically described as "moderate," but can still "cause brief radio blackouts at the poles and minor radiation storms that might endanger astronauts," according to NASA.

Scientists rank solar flares into five lettered categories, of which M is the fourth strongest. Within each category, higher numbers represent larger outbursts.

High solar activity was also observed in the days prior. On Saturday, the sun ejected an M4-class flare from sunspot AR3088. "The glancing blow could spark G1-class geomagnetic storms starting on the 28th and stretching into Aug. 29," SpaceWeather reported. On Sunday (Aug. 28), the same sunspot unleashed an M6.7-class flare, causing radio blackouts over much of North America, the site reported.

In response to the Saturday flare, NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center issued an M1 (minor) geomagnetic storm warning for Monday. This level of storm could have minor impacts to satellite operations, power grids and animal migration patterns.

Skywatchers in the Northern Hemisphere have been treated to brilliant auroras thanks to the flare's resulting coronal mass ejection (CME) interacting with Earth's atmosphere. The auroras were visible as far south as Scotland, Alberta, and Montana, according to skywatchers on Twitter.

Most geomagnetic storms resulting from solar flares have minimal effects on Earth or spacecraft, although some powerful storms can damage electrical infrastructure or disrupt radio communications. This year, the sun has been particularly active, with numerous large solar flares and coronal mass ejections wreaking havoc on some satellites and creating stunning aurora displays.

This increased activity could suggest that the sun is beginning to "wake up" from a more restful phase of its regular 11-year cycle of activity. Some forecasters have suggested that the upcoming solar cycle could be among the strongest in recorded history, although our ability to forecast the sun's behavior remains limited.

@thewonderofspace
163 views13:29
Open / Comment
2022-08-30 13:46:48
Amateur model of a black hole

Did you know that black holes are not at all what they are usually depicted as (similar to funnels and bubbles)?

In fact, a doughnut-shaped gas disk rotates and glows around the black hole, the edge of which is sucked in. The black hole itself appears as a spot in the central part.

@thewonderofspace
229 views10:46
Open / Comment
2022-08-29 21:11:21 Even before fueling the SLS rocket, NASA faced challenges during Monday's launch countdown. Offshore storms and lightning delayed fueling of the SLS rocket by nearly an hour, forcing launch controllers to work to catch up for lost time.

With NASA unable to launch today, the agency could try for one of at least two back-up days on which to fly Artemis 1 on its mission to the moon. If the agency solves the Engine No. 3 issue, it could try to launch again Friday (Sept. 2) or Sept. 5, weather permitting. If NASA cannot launch by Sept. 5, its next launch try would likely be in October, mission managers have said. Launch opportunities are limited by the stage of the moon and lighting conditions upon reentry, among other considerations.

"The earliest opportunity, depending on what happens with this engine bleed, would be Sept. 2," Nail said. "However, we will await a determination of what the plan is to go forward."

Artemis 1 will send an uncrewed Orion capsule to lunar orbit and back, on a mission that will take six weeks from liftoff to splashdown. It will be the first flight for the long-delayed SLS and the second for Orion, which made a brief trip to Earth orbit back in 2014. (Orion rode atop a United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy rocket on that uncrewed test flight.)

Artemis 1 will also be the first mission for NASA's Artemis program, which aims to establish a long-term, sustainable human presence on and around the moon. If all goes well with Artemis 1, NASA will be clear to start gearing up for Artemis 2, which will send astronauts on a journey around the moon.

NASA is targeting 2024 for the Artemis 2 liftoff and 2025 or 2026 for Artemis 3, which will land astronauts on the moon for the first time since the final Apollo mission in 1972.

@thewonderofspace
239 views18:11
Open / Comment
2022-08-29 21:05:32 NASA calls off Artemis 1 moon rocket launch over engine cooling issue

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — An engine cooling issue on NASA's giant new rocket for deep-space exploration forced the agency to call off the booster's much-anticipated launch debut early Monday (Aug. 29).

NASA had mostly fueled its first Space Launch System (SLS) megarocket to launch the Artemis 1 moon mission on Monday when launch controllers were unable to chill one of the four main engines to the temperatures needed to handle its super-cold propellant. The issue stalled plans to launch the SLS rocket and its uncrewed Orion spacecraft on an ambitious 42-day test flight around the moon. Liftoff was scheduled for 8:33 a.m. EDT (1233 GMT).

Chilling the SLS rocket's engines before flowing cryogenic liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen through them is a required step before the rocket can launch, NASA officials said. While three of the engines passed that test, Engine No. 3 did not, despite troubleshooting efforts.

"Launch controllers condition the engines by increasing pressure on the core stage tanks to bleed some of the cryogenic propellant to the engines to get them to the proper temperature range to start them," NASA officials said in a statement. "Engine 3 is not properly being conditioned through the bleed process, and engineers are troubleshooting."

All four of these engines flew on NASA's space shuttle program of reusable vehicles.

According to NASA spokesperson Derrol Nail, the engine conditioning was not something that the team was able to verify during the "wet dress rehearsal" process that concluded in June.

"This is something they wanted to test during Wet Dress 4 but were unable to," Nail said. "So this was the first opportunity for the team to see this live in action. It's a particularly tricky issue even going in to get that temperature dialed in, according to engineers."

The Engine No. 3 conditioning issue cropped up as NASA worked through a series of glitches during the countdown, including a liquid hydrogen leak early in the fueling process and a possible crack in a part of core booster known as the intertank flange, which connects the SLS's giant liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen tanks. The tanks can hold a combined 730,000 gallons (3.3 million liters) of propellant.

"The flanges are connection joints that function like a seam on a shirt, are affixed at the top and bottom of the intertank so the two tanks can be attached to it," NASA said in the update.

NASA engineers found that the crack was actually in the insulating foam on the flange, not in the rocket's metal structure. "That ice that formed is essentially air that's being chilled by the tank that gets trapped inside of a crack in the foam but not the actual tank," Nail said.

Nail added that NASA personnel had seen similar cracks in the foam when it was used on the space shuttles before their retirement in 2011.

The Engine No. 3 problems and the feared crack followed concerns about a liquid hydrogen leak in the rocket. The leak during the fueling process appeared similar to one that occurred during an SLS fueling test earlier this year, Nail noted. But NASA officials were not quick to judge.

"Although a similar issue was identified in an earlier wet dress rehearsal, it may not necessarily be the same cause," NASA officials wrote in a subsequent update.

NASA stopped and restarted the flow of liquid hydrogen into the tank in an attempt to verify the leak and even proceeded with fueling the 322-foot-tall (98 meters) rocket's upper stage while engineers worked the issue.
217 viewsedited  18:05
Open / Comment