🔥 Burn Fat Fast. Discover How! 💪

www.upscguide.in

Logo of telegram channel upscguidetelegram — www.upscguide.in W
Logo of telegram channel upscguidetelegram — www.upscguide.in
Channel address: @upscguidetelegram
Categories: Education
Language: English
Country: India
Subscribers: 26.65K
Description from channel

This Is the official telegram channel of upsc guide
UPSC relevant content.
Website
Web : https://www.upscguide.in/
App : http://bit.ly/2LeGuhx
Email : upscguideindia@gmail.com
Phone : 8983766676
#jaihind

Ratings & Reviews

2.67

3 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

1

3 stars

0

2 stars

2

1 stars

0


The latest Messages 15

2021-10-21 09:50:37
On which among the following dates, the Gandhi-Irwin Pact was signed?
Anonymous Quiz
27%
5 March 1931
32%
6 March 1931
22%
7 March 1931
20%
8 March 1931
763 voters1.5K viewsUPSC.GUIDE IYI, 06:50
Open / Comment
2021-10-21 09:50:11
Who was the president of INC at the time of independence?
Anonymous Quiz
8%
Gandhi
62%
JB Kripalani
16%
Sarojini Naidu
15%
None of the above
737 voters1.5K viewsUPSC.GUIDE IYI, 06:50
Open / Comment
2021-10-21 09:49:50
Who among the following has written Ghoolamgiri?
Anonymous Quiz
12%
Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar
22%
Acharya Vinoba Bhave
60%
Jyotiba Phule
6%
Dadu Dayal
685 voters1.3K viewsUPSC.GUIDE IYI, 06:49
Open / Comment
2021-10-21 08:16:38 *Countering the Chinese Threat*

Relevance: Understanding the policies/strategies of China in the Indian context.
Synopsis: India should adopt a multi-level approach to counter the encircling of China.

Introduction

Over the period of time, China has made its position stronger and has now emerged as a threat to India.  Recently, RSS Chief in his Vijayadashami speech also raised concerns over the China-Pakistan-Taliban-Turkey nexus.

How China emerges as a threat to India?

China has successfully encircled India, and now it is in the process of making its grip tighter. Following are the few instances where India can see it happening:
Friendly relations: It has successfully built friendly relations with India’s neighboring countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and now Afghanistan. China is also intensifying its relations with Iran, Turkey and some Central Asian republics.
But Pakistan and its economy are in their worst state. Taliban have not been recognized by the world. And Turkey, at its best, can sell few drones to Pakistan, provided Pakistan pays for it.
Propaganda: Recently, China released a series of videos from the Galwan clash of June 2020. These are Indian soldiers who were captive for three days. This is complemented by warlike commentary in Global Times or other Chinese weapons of psychological warfare. The reaction from Beijing to Vice-President Venkaiah Naidu’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh is one such example.
Border engagement with Bhutan: Chinese media claims of a border engagement with Bhutan. The reaction shows that these talks will happen with or without India.
Ladakh position: In the 13th Corps Commander level talks, China presented its hardstand and issued offensive statements with a “take-it-or-you-won’t-even-have-it” like attitude.
Other surface areas: China has bought various dormant regions like the Barahoti plains in the Central sector and Tawang in the east to life. It has also increased its deployments in Ladakh and is in the progress of making it permanent.
Russia: Recently Russian President praised China for its stronghold as it does not need to use force to take Taiwan. This shows the emerging strong position of China.
Trade: According to Pia Krishnankutty report, in trade relations, China has a surplus of about $47 bn. It also seems poised to break the record of $63.05 billion.

How India is tackling the Chinese threat?

First, In Ladakh, China attained the dominant position through the use of the first-mover advantage. They no longer have this advantage, as was found out by China when they tried similar tactics in Tawang.
Second, every harsh step by China is pushing India closer to the USA and away from Russia. That is the reason India signed LEMOA and other strategic agreements with the USA. C Raja Mohan also anticipated that India can sign a similar deal with the French as well.

What India should do?

It is true that India needs to secure its borders to tackle the challenge. But India needs to focus on building alliances to counter the rising Chinese threat. Thus, at this critical juncture, India cannot afford a polarised society. India can fight China, but not with a divided house.
1.5K viewsUPSC.GUIDE IYI, 05:16
Open / Comment
2021-10-20 13:13:34 *Deconstructing climate finance*

Relevance: Green debt and Climate finance

Synopsis: Behind the rhetoric of mobilising climate finance lies the grim reality of burdening the G77 and its people with a fresh load of “green” debt.

Introduction

Media reports have claimed that developed countries are inching closer to the target of providing $100 billion annually in climate finance to developing countries by 2025 (the original target was 2020).
This view has been supported by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which claimed that climate finance provided by developed countries had reached $78.9 billion in 2018.
These claims are false.

What are the issues underlying in climate finance?

Flawed and erroneous claims: the OECD figure includes private finance and export credits. Developing countries have insisted that developed country climate finance should be from public sources and should be provided as grants or as concessional loans.
Currently available adaptation finance is significantly lower than the needs expressed in the Nationally Determined Contributions submitted by developing countries.
Less public financing: the OECD report makes it clear that the public finance component amounted to only $62.2 billion in 2018. Between 2013 and 2018, the share of loans has continued to rise, while the share of grants decreased.
Non-concessional loans: Of the public finance component, loans comprise 74%, while grants make up only 20%. From 2016 to 2018, 20% of bilateral loans, 76% of loans provided by multilateral development banks and 46% of loans provided by multilateral climate funds were non-concessional.
Debt crisis: The overwhelming provisioning of climate finance through loans risks exacerbates the debt crisis of many low-income countries.
Inflating climate finance figures: The OECD reports on climate finance have long been criticised for including funds for development projects such as health and education. Oxfam estimates that in 2017-18, out of an average of $59.5 billion of public climate finance reported by developed countries, the climate-specific net assistance ranged only between $19 and $22.5 billion per year.
Hollowness of the OECD claims: The 2018 Biennial Assessment of UNFCCC’s Standing Committee on Finance reports that on average, developed countries provided only $26 billion per year as climate-specific finance between 2011-2016. This rose to an average of $36.2 billion in 2017-18.

How USA has performed with respect to climate financing?

Broken promises: U.S. President recently said that the U.S. will double its climate finance by 2024. But it is Congress that will decide on the quantum after all. The U.S. also has a history of broken commitments. It had promised $3 billion to the Green Climate Fund (GCF) under President Barack Obama, but delivered only $1 billion before President Donald Trump withdrew U.S. support from the GCF.
Private funds: the future focus of U.S. climate finance is the mobilisation of private sector investment. As per the USA, public finance would only contribute to “de-risking” of investment.
Only commercially viable projects: the funds will be directed to those projects judged “bankable” and not selected based on developing countries’ priorities and needs.

What is the way forward?

Climate finance need balance between adaptation and mitigation. The 2016 Adaptation Gap Report of the UN Environment Programme had noted that the annual costs of adaptation in developing countries could range from $140 to $300 billion annually by 2030 and rise to $500 billion by 2050.
Delivering on climate finance is fundamental to increase trust in the multilateral process.
1.7K viewsUPSC.GUIDE IYI, 10:13
Open / Comment
2021-10-20 10:43:44
1.6K viewsUPSC.GUIDE IYI, 07:43
Open / Comment
2021-10-18 09:49:00
Today at 5:00 Pm you have L 1 of International Relations
(L 1 will be free to all aspirants)

Link: https://www.upscguide.in/international-relations-for-upsc-2022

Faculty: Dr. Raj Kumar Sir

About Faculty:

PhD Awarded on May 27th, 2016, Thesis title ‘ State Response to Problem of Food Security in Tajikistan, 1991-2013from JNU (2011 -2015)
Teaching and Research Experience since Last 6+ Years.
IR Faculty at UPSC GUIDE, Sriram’s IAS New Delhi, since last five years.
Visiting Faculty at GRACE IAS Bengaluru.
Experience at IGNOU Interactive Radio Counselling
Research Fellow, United Service Institution of India
Author of Various books and Articles in Journals.
Contributing Writer, Nikkei Asian Review, Japan
Many Paper Presentation across various recognized Universities and Seminar’s
602 viewsUPSC Guide, 06:49
Open / Comment