Bill Gates is not a tyrant, not even an aspiring tyrant. He is | Imperium Press

Bill Gates is not a tyrant, not even an aspiring tyrant. He is a capitalist, and that is the problem: what we have is not "neofeudalism", still less "socialism", but "neocapitalism". There are some in our scene who tolerate or even affirm capitalism while opposing the WEF—this is like drinking beer to cure a hangover.

Capitalism is not simply private property, and anticapitalism is not crypto-Marxism. For one, anticapitalism is as old as capitalism—the strongest anticapitalists were from the French Counter-Enlightenment, who mostly predated Marx, surpassed him in analytic power, and had nothing to do with him.

Capitalism is not private property because private property is almost as old as humanity. It is not about industrialization, profit, markets, commerce, nor even capital itself. Capitalism is at bottom the desacralization of property, it is not something new but the end point of a very long process whereby property became progressively detached from sacred uses—all property has slowly become res nec mancipi. And this is what we hate about capitalism: it is materialistic, exploitative, usurious, and mercantile. All these things are distorted ways of saying capitalism is irreligious, that the relationship between owner and owned is purely utilitarian, nothing is off limits, nothing is sacred. Above all, man has no duties to the earth and to nature itself, a point touched on in my recent Substack article.

There is really no way to be an effective political dissident today without opposing capital.

https://t.me/birdmanchan/781