2022-06-18 03:07:21
An Invitation to Join
Doctors Against Mandates
Supreme Court Action
www.doctorsagainstmandates.com Are taking on the CHO medical/nursing Mandates in the Supreme Court.
A number of our AMPS Doctors are trying to address the gross government overreach, as failure to do so now could herald a very dystopian future where unwanted medical interventions are forced on both our families and the population. They are reaching out to invite other Health Professionals to join their fight.
Now is the time to make a stand and the Supreme Court process is the only avenue open at this time. The more litigants we have, the greater psychological effect this action will have and it lowers the risk to individual litigants. We have a fantastic panel of internationally well known expert witnesses and you can make this action stronger and have a voice in your own future, while you still can.
If you would like to be involved in the legal action as a litigant you can join as a financial non public supporter
until June 16.
To express your interest please contact kara.thomas@npaaservices.org.au
“Doctors against Mandates” are aware that up until now, the courts have tended to uphold the dominant narrative. Judges have shown deference to ‘authorities’ such as CHOs, TGA, ATAGI, Health Ministries, FDA, CDC and WHO and similar around the world. The media (cross owned with and heavily dependent on Big Pharma revenue) have trumpeted this ‘safe and effective and necessary’ narrative, which influenced everyone in society including the judiciary. Many cases have been defeated early, on procedural grounds and claims of lack of standing.
So we realise we are up against a false but powerful Big Pharma driven ‘Narrative’. To persuade judges that the narrative is wrong, that it is based on Big Pharma influenced, and at times outright fraudulent, ‘science’, and that there has been suppression of the full evidence-base by Media, Big Tech Social Media and health practitioner regulators like AHPRA, will need them to overcome significant cognitive dissonance.
However, even if we lose the case, the aim is to place on the legal record in a state Supreme Court of an Australian jurisdiction, a vast amount of evidence that these experimental gene-based products:
1. Fail in efficacy:
a) they do not stop transmission,
b) with increasing ‘booster’ shots and new variants such as Omicron there is evidence of emerging negative efficacy against infection, severe disease and death,
c) and over 150 published articles attest that natural immunity is much superior to vaccine immunity.
2. Are extremely unsafe:
a) there are well over 1,000 published studies and case reports of gene-based vaccine harms,
b) the spike proteins produced through the body by the gene-based vaccines are toxic to the organs they are created in,
c) the spike proteins are now shown to enter the nucleus and interfere with human DNA,
d) There are unprecedented reports of severe adverse events, chronic disability and deaths to official vaccine injury reporting databases around the world – and reflected in the Pfizer data that the FDA tried to keep hidden but is now being released under court-ordered FOIA application.
We hope that the weight of evidence prevails and our litigation is successful in stopping these mandates in the state of QLD and add to legal precedence to do so elsewhere. But also this case will pave the way, win or lose, for future litigation as the ‘mass formation’ groupthink eventually breaks down and humanity wakes up to the calamity of this Big Pharma driven project.
Warm regards
Kara ThomasAssistant State Secretary
AMPS - Australian Medical Professionals' AssociationP: (07) 3497 5048 | hotline@amps.asn.au | www.amps.asn.au
130 views00:07
C
