In fact, the DOJ has previously argued that an officer 'willfu | Techno_Fog

In fact, the DOJ has previously argued that an officer "willfully" violated a victim's constitutional rights (and thus violated federal law) where the offending officer had training on the use of force.

DOJ Argument in previous case: "The jury could therefore have viewed Brown’s prior training as evidence that his conduct was willful."

We'll have an article going into further detail on how the DOJ was wrong and misled the public in the Ashli Babbitt in the coming days.