Corona Investigative

2021-04-14 11:22:55 PANDEMIC CRITICALLY CONSIDERED


PENTAGON DEVELOPS MICROCHIP THAT DETECTS COVID UNDER YOUR SKIN

Implanted microchips are supposed to detect Covid in our blood.
Several times, the article appeases the reader. It is not for conspiracy theorists, who should calm down right away. This wording should set alarm bells ringing. And as much as the author of the text tries to downplay the chips - I'm sorry, she doesn't succeed. Just because they can't track my movements, but ONLY analyze my blood and report the results out, I'm not reassured. Are you?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/12/microchip-developed-by-pentagon-to-detect-covid-19/

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-14 11:16:01 FALSIFIED DEATH FIGURES FRAUD


MONEY RAINING DOWN FOR "COVID DEAD"

CHANGING CAUSE OF DEATH AFTER THE FACT PAYS OFF
NEW YORK CITY, 4/13.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and her Senate colleague Chuck Shumer, also a Democrat, with positive news for anyone whose loved one died after January 2020. Because the first days of the "pandemic were so tumultuous," New Yorkers can now correct the cause of death of their loved ones. If Covid-19 is now listed as the cause of death with FEMA, there will be between $9,000 to $35,000 in funeral benefits retroactively, funded by a federal "Funeral Assistance Program."
Interest seems to be very high. On the first day, there were 1 million calls. So now in New York, there will be a miraculous clustering of 2020 Covis deaths - especially among poor immigrant families. ...and these numbers will then be used to prove "institualized racism" in the "p(l)andemy.

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-14 11:07:42 Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16

The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18

How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what.

Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest.

Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation. Clear, open, and advance publication of the scientific basis for policy, procurements, and wonder drugs is a fundamental requirement.19

The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesn’t need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers’ money.

Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.

Source: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-14 11:05:13 PANDEMIC CRITICALLY CONSIDERED


When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office.34

Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.56 Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7

Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.1011

The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers.1213 Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office.14 Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper.

Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest. Open / Comment

2021-04-14 10:59:02 TYRANNY IN THE NAME OF SECURITY

Addendum to the post above.


It has been confirmed that it is indeed the case that people are not saved without Covid vaccination. It doesn't get any more misanthropic than that. This is the logical consequence of the blind misbelief in non-existent invisible evil pathogens that have never been scientifically proven.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9458673/Only-St-Vincent-residents-whove-Covid-jabs-evacuated-cruise-ships-PM-announces.html

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-14 10:44:48 PANDEMIC MEDIA PROPAGANDA


Shameless lie by CBS?

CBS claims that citizens who have not been vaccinated against Covid will not be saved from the consequences of the volcanic eruption on the island of St. Vincent. The video is real, because I have already seen a version filmed with a cell phone from the TV and the same thing was said there. I do not believe that the authorities on St. Vincent are doing this and I believe that CBS is a malicious liar. Also other media do not report that this would be the case.

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-13 14:29:33 PANDEMIC MEDIA PROPAGANDA

CDC Director's Emotional Manipulation | Fear Tactics

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-13 14:07:36 MANUFACTURED CRISES TO TRANSFORM THE WORLD


EUROPEAN PLANS FOR ‘VACCINE PASSPORTS’ WERE IN PLACE 20 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE PANDEMIC. COINCIDENCE?

Many countries are planning to introduce vaccination cards soon. These would allow people to access stores, restaurants, cafes, hotels, cinemas and concerts. They would also be needed for travel. The government and the media pretend that the measure is a direct result of the corona pandemic.

In Europe, work on vaccination cards had been underway for 20 months before the Corona outbreak.

The European Commission published a proposal on vaccination passports on April 26, 2018, well hidden in a document that the mainstream media did not publicize.

Then, in early 2019, a roadmap was published that further elaborates on the EU Commission's plans. The roadmap states that the Commission will introduce a vaccination passport for EU citizens by 2022.

The document's authors lament that global vaccination rates are falling due to "lack of access, vaccine shortages, misinformation, underestimation of disease risks, low confidence in the value of vaccines, and disinvestment." They come up with 10 steps to "give everyone the opportunity to benefit from the power of vaccination."

Following the release of the 10-page document, a global vaccination summit was held, hosted by the European Commission and WHO.

This summit took place in Brussels on September 12, 2019, just three months before the Covid-19 outbreak, and included leaders, health ministers, senior scientists, and UN officials.

Three roundtable discussions were held during the summit, featuring Nanette Cocero of Pfizer, Seth Berkley of GAVI - an organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - and Joe Cerrell of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Participants were handed a series of documents that repeatedly emphasized strengthening collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry. The picture that emerges from the documents is that a pandemic is "inevitable."

Who really benefits from vaccination cards? Certainly not ordinary citizens, for whom sharing their health data and other personal information could soon become mandatory in order to participate in society. Instead, the main beneficiary will be the multinational pharmaceutical industry. With global sales of drugs and vaccines already estimated at $1.5 trillion this year, pharmaceutical companies and their investors are rejoicing at the prospect of vaccination passports becoming mandatory worldwide.

The total market for COVID-19 vaccines is estimated to be worth $100 billion in sales and $40 billion in after-tax profits. Annual vaccinations against mutations of the coronavirus could drive these numbers even higher. If we do not oppose vaccine passes and instead "vote for common sense," drug and vaccine manufacturers could force the world into long-term economic and political dependence. Our urgent goal must therefore be to replace the greed-driven pharmaceutical "business of disease" with a health care system based on truly preventive approaches. Accepting the pharmaceutical industry's alternative to this is simply unthinkable.


Read full Article: https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2021/04/european-plans-for-vaccine-passports-were-in-place-20-months-prior-to-the-pandemic-coincidence/

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-13 13:54:21 A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE BEGINNING OF MODERN MEDICINE


LOUIS PASTEUR: THE JEWISH CONNECTION


By chance I came across this article. From this article it is clear that from the very beginning Jewish interests is and was the driving force behind the creation of the modern vaccine industry. They promoted and covered up the frauds of Louis Pastor back then and even today all the big pharmaceutical companies are firmly in Jewish hands. One can clearly see a pattern here. The article is of course written in laudatory terms without exposing the contradictions. Nevertheless, it provides important pieces of the puzzle for the overall picture. I am posting the article here for discussion. For the true goings-on of Louis Pasteur, who can only be described as a scientific fraud and on whose fraud the modern vaccination industry is built, I recommend the book "The private science of Louis Pasteur", which is available here in the channel (see below).

Read the Article:
https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/louis-pasteur-the-jewish-connection/2020/07/29/

____________

Related Articles:

Exposing the myth of the germ theory

Bechamp or Pasteur? & The cult of the microbe:
The origin of 'preventive medicine' (e-book)

The prior history of the 'germ theory'

The Private Science of Louis Pasteur (e-book)

Virchow - A strategist of power (Part 1)

How the theory of deadly microbes took power in medicine and society

_ Open / Comment

2021-04-13 13:17:59 TYRANNY IN THE NAME OF SECURITY


Forcibly vaccinating the disabled

Each of the perpetrators believes they are doing something good here and are in the right.It seems that all it takes is a flimsy excuse to turn brainwashed people into monsters.

_ Open / Comment