Get Mystery Box with random crypto!

Follow the Data with Dr Frank

Logo of telegram channel followthedata — Follow the Data with Dr Frank F
Logo of telegram channel followthedata — Follow the Data with Dr Frank
Channel address: @followthedata
Categories: Politics
Language: English
Subscribers: 21.74K
Description from channel

Follow the Data with Dr Frank!

Ratings & Reviews

3.33

3 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

2

3 stars

0

2 stars

1

1 stars

0


The latest Messages 115

2021-12-14 00:08:28
One of the challenges I face is explaining complicated mathematics to the public in ways they can understand.

I want to be precise and accurate in my explanations, but not too complicated. This is a challenge!

I've used the "83 Rolls of the Die" illustration with great success. People seem to get it. That addresses the statistics of the situation. But people still struggle with the concept of the Registration Key.

Here is my latest try at explaining it with simple words in a way that people can understand...
3.3K viewsDr Frank, edited  21:08
Open / Comment
2021-12-14 00:08:28
3.2K viewsDr Frank, edited  21:08
Open / Comment
2021-12-13 23:01:50
People sometimes ask me,

"How can you be a scientist and a Christian?"

How can you not be?
3.9K viewsDr Frank, edited  20:01
Open / Comment
2021-12-13 22:06:46
"The Bank Manager"

Imagine that you are the manager of a bank. We bring you evidence suggesting that a bunch of the money in your vault is counterfeit, and that some of the real currency has been removed.

What is your reply?

"We have the most secure vault in history."

Certainly not. If this were your response, you should be fired. Instead, given the evidence, it is *your responsibility* to investigate. But instead you say...

"Bring me the evidence."

So we bring you mountains more evidence. Your response is...

"You shouldn't raise such allegations. It will diminish people's confidence in the security of our bank."

In other words, you are an irresponsible bank manager, more interested in saving face than securing the funds in your bank. You need to be removed from your job.

Immediately.

Our votes are more precious than cash. Any public official not investigating the massive election fraud that took place in November 2020 needs to be removed from their job.

Immediately.
5.5K viewsDr Frank, edited  19:06
Open / Comment
2021-12-13 21:11:58
5.1K viewsDr Frank, 18:11
Open / Comment
2021-12-12 20:13:46 “Trolls”

I don’t mind real questions on my pages, and I try to address some of them, even modifying my posts and presentations because of them.

But when someone continues to ask a series of uninformed and misleading questions, it becomes clear that they are merely trolls with an agenda.

They can grind their own axes on their own pages, and people can ignore them since they have nothing meaningful to say.

They get uninvited from my table.
8.2K viewsDr Frank, edited  17:13
Open / Comment
2021-12-12 19:37:10 “Baby Steps”

I’ve been posting about our elections for about a year now. People that have been following me the whole time have had the opportunity to learn incrementally. People that are new to the concepts often find the amount of data and analyses overwhelming.

Newcomers who want to understand are going to have to do their homework in order to catch up, probably here and on my MeWe channel (same name), because my Facebook and YouTube pages have been censored.

It’s simply too much to repost everything, but I’ve reposted some critical pieces on the “DrFrank” Rumble channel. There is also a lot posted on this channel, and there are dozens of my talks posted all over the web.

People tend to be lazy, and they want everything handed to them on a silver platter. Well, sorry. Some concepts require work to understand; and you have to earn your understanding.

We’ve conditioned entire generations of people into thinking that they can just “google” things to learn. Well, this is simply not true. Profound, deep learning, requires discipline and effort.

As a scientist, I’ve learned that the most amazing concepts in the universe are not digestible and appreciated without effort. The same for theology and apologetics.

The diluted pablum you get on the Discovery channel, for instance, borders on professional malpractice. You are presented with cheap substitutes for the real thing... because they are easy and quick to understand. But the presentations are often misleading, intellectually deficient, and incorrect.

I am reminded of what the Apostle Paul wrote in Hebrews, chapter 5:

11 About this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. 12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food, 13 for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child. 14 But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.”
7.9K viewsDr Frank, edited  16:37
Open / Comment
2021-12-12 18:36:28 “Reconciliation”

There are some key take-always from my analyses of state elections and voter rolls.

1) The numbers in the voter rolls do not reconcile with the official state reports, 10% errors are common;

2) The numbers in the voter rolls are manipulated by computer algorithms, making them highly predictable;

3) The voter rolls are not static; they are continuously in flux. Since election officials typically do not regularly back these up (archived snapshots) it provides a fertile environment for hiding election fraud;

4) To expose this situation, I typically ask election officials to provide a list of everyone who voted in the November 2020 election. It is shocking (and illegal) that our officials are incapable of answering this most basic of questions;

5) Voter registration rolls typically grow faster than the population growth, and county records in many states move synchronously, demonstrating that they are being centrally manipulated;

6) Since the databases are continuously in flux, one person’s analysis may differ than someone else’s because they are starting from different source data. This does not invalidate a particular analysis... in fact, it exposes a major flaw in the system.

How simple it would be to simply have a paper poll book... with one page per person. The problem with this is that politicians would have less access to the voter rolls, and cheaters would have less ability to cheat.

Wait... isn’t that what we want?
7.7K viewsDr Frank, edited  15:36
Open / Comment
2021-12-12 18:23:55 I checked out a discussion of my work on another page, expecting to find some substantial criticisms of my work. Instead, it was a waste of my time. The same tired objections from people who don’t understand what I am doing.

I welcome genuine criticism of my work, but in order to understand it and participate meaningfully you will need to do some work. I suggest downloading a small Ohio county (free on the SoS website), and attempting to reproduce the graphs I’ve posted on Rumble. As you do this work, you will learn and understand what is going on.

I’ve described it plenty. But it’s like eating chocolate; I can describe the experience all day long, but you need to taste it for yourself in order to understand.
6.4K viewsDr Frank, edited  15:23
Open / Comment
2021-12-12 10:59:53 "Confirmation"

I love it when I receive an email that goes something like this:

"Dr Frank, I've downloaded the registration rolls for my state and performed the analysis you've described in your talks. I'm having a bit of trouble with xxxx, can you look at my spreadsheet and tell me what I am missing?"

Or, like this:

"Dr Frank, I've downloaded the registration rolls for my state and performed the analysis you've described in your talks. The polynomial is there, just like you predicted. I'd like to add the 2019 population data to my graphs as well. Where did you get it?"

Or, like this:

"Dr Frank, I work for xxxx [businesses and government agencies] and I don't want anyone to know that I did this work, or I will lose my job. But here is my complete analysis of my state, along with the source data. It confirms precisely what you said it would. Use it as you will, just keep me out of it!"

There are about a dozen or so people around the country (that I know of) that have reproduced the county level Registration Key analysis for their state.

Math is math. 2 + 2 = 4. It doesn't matter who does it.

My work has been reproduced by many folks. If you don't believe it, try it yourself! Get the data for a single county in your state and get to work. Then send me your work at DrDouglasGFrank@outlook.com. I'll even give you a shout-out if you want it.
7.9K viewsDr Frank, edited  07:59
Open / Comment