🔥 Burn Fat Fast. Discover How! 💪

Heirs of the Promise

Logo of telegram channel heirsofpromise — Heirs of the Promise H
Logo of telegram channel heirsofpromise — Heirs of the Promise
Channel address: @heirsofpromise
Categories: Religion
Language: English
Subscribers: 220
Description from channel

Christian Identity
Praise Yahweh, The Holy One of Israel
The God of the White Race
Heirs through Abraham, Issac, and Jacob
Christogenea.org
Page Owner @Zephial

Ratings & Reviews

3.00

2 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

0

3 stars

2

2 stars

0

1 stars

0


The latest Messages 2

2021-06-12 19:32:59
The Good Message
OT REF: KJV NT REF:
CNT

Paul talks of The Good Message and preached it to all the Israelite Nations. It is the message of Yahshua Christ but more specifically how His death has removed our sins, saved the Israelites from their judgement of death as well as Adam and every Adamite after Him as the first covenant with man was between Yahweh and Adam. Though Israel has a closer relationship with Yahweh than the other Adamic Nations as the wife of Yahweh. The Good Message is that everyone shall live (1 Cor 15:22) and fulfill their original purpose in creation (Wis. of Solomon 2:23).

Cont.
803 viewsedited  16:32
Open / Comment
2021-06-12 00:02:38 Above are key posts from Adamic Awakening at times with the whole gang together and others, not so much... Still, they are important posts that are a great starting point for this page to begin building upon without any filler posts. Due to soft bans AA will only repost for those who can see it.

This is Heirs of the Covenant
A True Christian Identity page. CI is not as shallow as "Israel/Adam is white" but also confirming the doctrines of the Bible. These doctrines will not be found in the "church fathers" and it won't agree with the protestant sects either. There is no getting around disagreement with these sects as their beliefs are upheld by pagan and jewish writings throughout their history. Even Martin Luther was praising jewish works in his time, referencing their words constantly. We must shed these foolish ideas that are not based in True Christian doctrines or sound study. We must all take the time to ignore their work and study correctly, using Scripture to prove Scripture. not the words of some dead and gone pagans and jew followers.

2 Timothy 2:15
Be diligent to present yourself approved to Yahweh: a workman having no shame, correctly dissecting the word of truth.

Matthew 11:23
He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who is not gathering with Me scatters!

Scripture is the authority.
Not tradition, not men, and the scripture cannot contradict!
680 views21:02
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:51:29
Christogenea Historical Essays
Link

Essays demonstrating the historical truths of Christian Adamic and Israelite Identity from a study of the Bible, the Graeco-Roman Classics and Ancient Near Eastern archaeology.
129 views05:51
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:47:59
Christogenea: Two-Seedline Pragmatic Genesis Audio Commentary Link

The Pragmatic Genesis series explains the Bible from a Christian Identity perspective which reconciles both Old and New Testaments with history and the political and social realities facing the Christian people of Yahweh God today.
112 views05:47
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:34:32
YAHWEH IS ONE

His manifestations are not "multiple persons" and there is no such things as a catholic "godhead"

plain version
alternate orientation
Christogenea.org
86 views05:34
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:30:05 Yahweh is ONE. Period. (Deut 6:4)
He will manifest Himself as He so pleases and in as many ways simultaneously as He could desire. (Matt 3:16, Exo 3:4 etc.)
Yahweh is The Father. (Isa 64:8)
Christ is the Image of the Person of Yahweh. (Tim 2:5-6)
The Father came down as one of his own sons. (Heb 2:16)
Yahshua - YHWH SAVES - Christ is His Tabernacle. (Exo 14:30 "Yahweh saved", Eze 37:26-28; Isa 12:6)
Indeed the Son and the Father are one. (John 10:30)
Hence Christ can be the root and offspring of David. (Rev 22:16; Mat 22:41-46)

Through biblical scripture, you can come to the conclusion that Yahweh, which is the name of the Father, (Isa 64:8) who is our God; is required to have come down and lived as one of His own sons (Heb 2:16) and die as a man in order to release Israel from the Marriage Bonds and Remarry Israel (Acts 20:28, Hosea 2:19-20). This could not be accomplished without Yahweh's ability to transcend His creation, keep His Law, and come as His own son. The Husband must die to free the woman from judgement
(Rom 6:20-23; 7:1-6).

1 Cor 8:6 but to us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Prince (Lord), Yahshua Christ, through whom are all things, and we through Him.

John 20:28-29
Thomas answered and said unto him, My Prince (Lord) and my God.
Yahshua says to him: “Because you have seen Me you believe! Blessed are those not seeing and believing!”

Those against our position will be quick to recycle verses the churches have manipulated into their favor, have outright fabricated, or even truthful verses that have been misunderstood. They don't understand that these verses are of no use to their position. "What about" is not a proof and is besides the point. For example, one of these "silver bullet" verses is John 17:5, but they do not know the whole scriptures and cannot interpret the verse in such a manner without conflicting verses such as Isaiah 42:8, in a prophecy of the Gospel: “I am YHWH: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images”.

They need a correct method to scripture. It can't contradict, so we must seek objective verses (Isa 9:6, John 14:8-9) to interpret the rest.

This is not a Catholic, Orthodox, or any other Judeo-Christian group. We are not Trinitarian, and do not subscribe to any of these Church lingo-isms littering the academic scope of Christianity serving to pigeon-hole any belief oppositional to the mainstream churches. We do not need Platonists or other pagan philosophers to understand and dictate what Yahweh has said. Frilly priests and their vain rituals for luring in unsuspecting Christians to save themselves through works and tithe are also to be avoided like a plague. These things are not Christian.

With that said I encourage you to stray from this heresy. As a full fleshed argument would be hard to fit into one post, we have linked plenty of articles, commentaries, and essays that add to and explain what we believe found below. I would recommend "Who is Your Savior" and it's commentary.

Haast "Why I Believe Oneness"
Joe "Christian Identity or Trinitarianism"
Comparet "Who is Your Savior"
Emahiser "Holy One"
Emahiser "Yahweh singular-ELOHIM"
Emahiser "The Day The Word Became Flesh"
Finck Review of "Who is Your Savior"
Finck Review of "The Day The Word Became Flesh"
Finck John Series
115 viewsedited  05:30
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:30:05
The Many Manifestations of Yahweh

Throughout the ages there has been an endless stream of church heresies, and countless refurbished pagan rituals for these so called "Christian" fraternities that spring up; however, none of these traditions and vain dress are based on Christ's word. Many of these heresies originate from pagan beliefs being suited up as Christianity, others from misinterpreted scripture. One in particular that we would like to discuss is the Trinity and the pitfalls that come with it.

There are many renditions of the Trinity just like any biblical subject, however the core premise remains in direct opposition to everything Israel has been taught and handed down by God himself. This premise being Yahweh is composed of 3 distinct persons, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Cont.
229 viewsedited  05:30
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:27:24 CFT seems to believe the gift and fulfillment of the unconditional promises we have inherited are to be earned, or lost, through works. You earn a "wedding garment" if you are good enough on earth (Not through being born into the married family), and this clothing allows you to avoid the punishment of sin, not the death of Yahweh releasing us. You must also remember and confess to every sin you have committed, while on earth, lest you miss out on forgiveness you must earn (Misrepresented 1 John 1:9).

I believe this error stems from their equating forgiveness for sin, with salvation from the punishment of sin. You can forgive a child for drawing on the walls, however the crayon is still there and the spanking still happened. God not only forgives us but saved us from the punishment of death we, under the law, must have faced. While CFT is correct that we should not let having white skin overtake the importance of good deeds. If one uses God's sacrifice as a get out of jail free card, he likely isn't "truly" Christian to begin with, and using those that do as an example of why Israel can only be saved through works is backwards, inaccurate and scripturally unfounded.

True CI writing "The Good Message"

True CI message from our friend in the comments...
A very good case can be made for racial salvation based on the three verses that say ‘all Israel is saved’ (Romans 11:26, Isaiah 45:25, Isaiah 45:17 ) in the Bible. That is three witnesses. And then there are many supporting verses, such as ‘every knee shall bow’ and verses where Paul tells us about the fornicator and the Judgement of the Adamic man (1 Corinthians 3, 1 Corinthians 5). At Romans 11:26 Paul is actually speaking about unbelief, about the hardness of hearts in Judea.

CFT didnt mention Isaiah 45:25; it says “all the seed”.
Israel is a race.

A very strong case. Based on the plain words of Scripture. Certainly a good proof for racial salvation. Later we see Christ judging the nations and He divides by ethnos (the judgement of nations at Matthew 25).

To dismiss these witnesses CFT seems to use verses that have multiple valid interpretations. While Isaiah clearly says ‘all Israel is saved’ the verses CFT cites could be interpreted to be in agreement with racial salvation very easily. I would suggest that it is better to interpret such verses as CFT cites in respect of Isaiah rather than trying to reinterpret Isaiah with verses that have multiple possible meanings. It is a better approach, objectively speaking. We must have an approach that honestly seeks to understand the message of Scripture, to conform ourselves to Scripture with humility. CFT’s case relies on a flawed approach IMO. It isn't a very strong case because of it’s methodology. As I have explained.

I would rather interpret the verses CFT cites in respect of the plain meaning of Isaiah. I accept what the prophet says as true. I believe his report ; racial salvation is the Bible.

I look forward to the day when the traitors of our race receive their reward. They will have everlasting contempt which may be worse than death.

While many white folk will come to Christ so that their good works may be manifest.

When I profess racial salvation, that does not mean that all white folk will have an equal reward or that traitors will be happy since they will have no reward.



Now they have a new theory that Edomites were pure whites and the reason for Esau's failure was marrying pagans. Yet Jacob married pagan daughters of Laban, it is a racial issue and they have no clue what they are talking about. These people are failures...
100 views05:27
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:27:23
It has come to our attention that a website claiming to promote CI called "Christians for Truth", or CFT for short, is really just another
CI-lite dumpster fire. With their recent article "Will All Israel Be Saved or Just A Remnant?" it became crystal clear they are a group of choir boys that want to send their brethren to eternal destruction with the rest of the bastards. This is an unacceptable doctrine and a disgusting curse on all Adam kind.

This awful website does not allow the posting of Christogenea.org links or even the mentioning of the site. Seeing as CFT are unable to correctly dispense the Word of Yahweh and His Good Message, they should be avoided.

Cont.
84 viewsedited  05:27
Open / Comment
2021-06-03 08:17:43 Christians should not be like judeos, spiritualizing the words of the Bible such as seed, fathers, Israelite, etc. The Bible is not a book that needs a priest with mystical powers to understand it. All it requires is logic and consistency to keep it coherent. Taking a pre-conceived premise such as "all humanoids are mankind/Adam-kind", the judeo can never get anywhere in scriptural understanding without someone proving their non-biblical premise wrong with the plain words of scripture. The same goes for many more ideas including the trinity.

The correct method is using the plain words of Yahweh to understand scripture. We cannot create our views based on verses with multiple valid interpretations. We do not refute the words of Isaiah with other verses, rather they should be interpreted in respect of Isaiah.

Something Paul says to Romans cannot nullify something Christ said in the Gospel of Matthew.
Something Isaiah said in the time of the patriarchs cannot be nullified by the church fathers

♰ Abraham's seed would become many nations, not that many nations would become Abraham's seed (Gen 17)
♰ When we read that there is one YHWH and no other we can't then contend with His words (Isa 45; Joel 2:27)
♰ When Yahweh says "all the seed of Israel shall be justified" we can't then interpret other verses into believing we aren't. (Isa 45)
♰ Christ says "I am sent only to the lost sheep of Israel" and this cannot be changed by any other scripture! (Mat 15:24)

All scripture is good (2 Tim 3:16) but we must know what is scripture in the case of apocrypha and failures by the ancient scribes (Jer 8:8) such as Deut 23:7 being indiscernible in manuscripts between Edomite and Aramite (Syrian). Another example being the problem with Genesis 4:1

Romans 3:4 "Rather, Yahweh will be true, and every man a liar..."
Romans 3:7 "Indeed if the truth of Yahweh were increased by my lie for His honor, why then am I still judged as a wrongdoer?
"

YOU CANNOT DISPROVE SCRIPTURE, WITH SCRIPTURE
230 viewsedited  05:17
Open / Comment