Dr Naomi R Wolf

2021-08-10 23:42:16 Studies prove that vitamin D works against the coronavirus

Ever since the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic struck, a number of cures for COVID have been espoused. These cures included hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and vitamin D. Despite being suppressed by Big Pharma, many studies have shown that vitamin D plays a role in preventing hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19.

One such study done in November 2020 found that COVID-19 patients who had low levels of vitamin D had a higher chance of dying from the disease. The study published in Scientific Reports found that severe COVID-19 patients had “markedly low” vitamin D levels and high inflammatory responses. The Indian authors recommended “mass administration of vitamin D supplements” to populations at risk for COVID-19.”

A later study from May 2021, also published in Scientific Reports, noted the positive effects of vitamin D on the immune system. It argued that vitamin D promotes the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines. Many COVID-19 treatments focused on eliminating the virus in the body instead of regulating the hyper-inflammation caused by these cytokines.

Cytokines are proteins produced by the body to control inflammation. These cytokines are released in the case of infections, but there are times that excess cytokines than needed are produced. This resulting “cytokine storm” becomes dangerous – and has been linked to the deaths of COVID-19 patients.

The authors of the May 2021 study then looked at the effects of Pulse D therapy on COVID-19 patients’ cytokine levels. Pulse D therapy involved daily high-dose supplementation with vitamin D – as much as 60,000 international units (IU) – for a period of eight to 10 days. The therapy was done alongside standard therapy that COVID-19 patients received.

The patients who underwent Pulse D therapy saw their vitamin D levels increase significantly. Meanwhile, their inflammatory markers significantly decreased without any side effects. Thus, the study authors concluded that Pulse D therapy could be safely added to COVID-19 treatment protocols for improved outcomes.

A study using vitamin D3 also reported the same effect

Another study from June 2021 noted the positive effects of a type of vitamin D on COVID-19 patients in Spain. The study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism involved researchers giving vitamin D3, also called calcifediol, to patients in the COVID-19 ward of Hospital del Mar in Barcelona.

About half of the patients received 21,280 IU of vitamin D3 on the first day of the study, while the other half did not. The vitamin D3 group received an extra 10,640 IU of calcifediol on the third, seventh, 15th and 30th day of the study.

COVID-19 patients who received vitamin D3 fared significantly better, with only 4.5 percent requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. On the other hand, 21 percent of patients in the group that did not receive vitamin D3 required ICU admission. Treatment with vitamin D3 also reduced the COVID-19 fatality rate, with only 4.7 percent of the vitamin D3 group dying compared to the 15.9 percent death rate in the non-vitamin D3 group.

The authors of the June 2021 study concluded: “In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, calcifediol treatment significantly reduced ICU admission and mortality.” Initially submitted in January 2021, it was only published in June. @naomirwolf
Read more Open / Comment

2021-08-09 19:31:43 ​​Study links Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to eye inflammation

A recent multicenter study linked the Pfizer coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine to uveitis, a form of eye infection that affects the middle layer of tissue in the eye wall that can cause eye redness, pain and blurred vision.

The study led by Zohar Habot-Wilner was conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus, Galilee Medical Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, Kaplan Medical Center and Tel Aviv’s Sourasky Medical Center.

Habot-Wilner, who heads the Uveitis Service at Sourasky Medical Center, found that 21 people who received two shots of the Pfizer vaccine developed uveitis within one to 14 days after receiving their first shot or within one day to a month after the second.

“All the patients in the study met the World Health Organization and Naranjo criteria linking the onset of uveitis to the vaccination. This time frame is consistent with other reports of uveitis following various vaccines.” Habot-Wilner said.

She added that patients with other diseases that could have been related to uveitis were under control before vaccination. None of the patients had any changes in their systemic treatments for at least six months before getting the vaccine.

Only three of the cases were severe and all were anterior uveitis cases, which were treated by topical corticosteroids and eye drops for pupil dilation. One case worsened after getting the second dose of the vaccine but was resolved with appropriate treatment. “An examination at the end of the follow-up period found that in all eyes visual acuity improved and disease was completely resolved,” she said.

Habot-Wilner said that those who experience a uveitis attack after taking the vaccine should get ocular examination to get treated properly. She noted that eye inflammation has been associated with other vaccines. “If you do feel something is wrong with your eyes, if you have pain, redness or vision deterioration, please go and visit your eye doctor,” she said.

Signs and symptoms of uveitis

Uveitis is an eye inflammation that affects the middle layer of tissue in the eye wall. Its warning signs come on suddenly and get worse quickly, although there are cases where they develop gradually. Some causes of uveitis include infection, injury and autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. Sometimes, the cause can’t be identified.

When left untreated, uveitis could become a serious disease that can lead to permanent loss of vision. Early diagnosis and treatment are necessary to prevent future complications. Characteristics of uveitis may include eye redness, eye pain, light sensitivity, blurred vision, decreased vision and the presence of floating spots in your field of vision.

The type of uveitis depends on which parts of the eye are inflamed.

Anterior uveitis is most common as a COVID-19 vaccine side effect. It affects the inside of the front of the eye, between the cornea and the iris, and the ciliary body. It can also be called iritis and is the most common type of uveitis.

Intermediate uveitis affects the retina and blood vessels behind the lens as well as the gel in the center of the eye. Posterior uveitis affects the layer on the inside of the back of the eye, and panuveitis occurs when all layers of the uvea are inflamed.

The specific cause of uveitis is not clear in about half of the cases and it may be considered as an autoimmune disease that affects only the eyes. In cases when the cause is determined, it may be an autoimmune or inflammatory disorder, an infection, a medication side effect, eye injury or surgery or even cancer that affects the eye.

Uveitis can cause complications such as retinal swelling, retina scarring, glaucoma, cataracts, optic nerve damage, retinal detachment and permanent vision loss.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-08 22:00:20 ​​STUDY: Ivermectin is a safe and effective remedy for covid that costs less than $1 a day

New research out of Israel has found that administering the anti-parasite drug ivermectin to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) patients may help to drastically reduce the duration of infections – and all for less than $1 a day.

Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, launched a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial last May that evaluated the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among non-hospitalized Chinese Virus patients with mild to moderate infection.

That trial recently wrapped up, showing that the drug, which was first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) back in 1987, can help to minimize the impact of the Fauci Flu both safely and effectively.

The discoverers of ivermectin, by the way, were awarded a Nobel Prize in 2015 for successfully using ivermectin to treat onchocerciasis, a disease caused by infection with a parasitic roundworm.

Over the years, it has further been revealed that ivermectin is an effective remedy against scabies and head lice, as well as a variety of viruses ranging from HIV to common influenza to Zika to West Nile.

Since a five-day course of ivermectin costs around 60 cents in the third world, and about $10 in Israel, it is a highly economical remedy that could easily put an end to the plandemic and get everyone and everything back to the old normal. Because it works so well and costs next to nothing, however, the FDA and the World Health Organization (WHO) are saying no way, José!

Since ivermectin appears to work effectively, the government doesn’t want you to have access to it

In Schwartz’s study, 89 volunteers over the age of 18 who tested “positive” for Chinese Germs were divided into two groups: one that received ivermectin and the other that received a placebo. All participants took their pills for three days in a row one hour before every meal.

Every two days and at the end of the sixth day, each volunteer was administered a standard nasopharyngeal swab PCR test, which supposedly identifies viral loads of the Fauci Flu. (NOTE: This is highly disputed now that it has been revealed ( https://t.me/naomirwolf/154 ) that PCR tests were never designed to look for the Chinese Virus, but rather for seasonal influenza.)

Even so, what this process found is that about 72 percent of all volunteers who received ivermectin tested negative for the Chinese Virus by day six. In contrast, only 50 percent of those who received the placebo tested negative.

As for the culture viability of each patient, meaning how infectious they were by the end of the regimen, a mere 13 percent of the ivermectin group was still infectious after six days compared to 50 percent in the placebo group.

“Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” Schwartz said.

“It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact.”

Schwartz’s study has been published on the health research sharing site MedRxiv, where it has not yet been reviewed by peers. Another study that came to similar conclusions, however, has been peer-reviewed and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

Despite claims by the establishment to the contrary, ivermectin did not show any significant side effects in Schwartz’s trial, suggesting that it is not only inexpensive but also safe and effective.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-08 17:36:47 COVID-19

A PATHOLOGIST SUMMARY OF WHAT THESE JABS DO TO THE BRAIN AND OTHER ORGANS

Ryan Cole MD, AFLDS PHYSICIAN
A scientific clarification of what these injections do in the head and other organs of the vaccinated people

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-07 19:28:46 ​​Doctors share THEIR OWN vaccine injury horror stories, revealing that vaccines are devastating the medical profession

Medscape has launched a new portal where doctors can share their own personal stories about vaccine adverse events. And already there are well over 1,000 entries, many of which contain horror stories about how chemical injections are destroying people’s lives.

One doctor expressed concerns about how low-risk, healthy adults are being pressured by the government and the media to get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). Children and even babies are also now being pressured as well.

Another linked to the Health Resources & Services Administration website, which contains information for people who have suffered vaccine injuries to apply for compensation through the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.

Entry after entry tells of how vaccines of all kinds, including the ones launched by Donald Trump under “Operation Warp Speed,” are damaging people’s bodies and in some cases killing them.

The medical establishment would rather us all believe that such incidents are “rare,” but the truth is that they are much more common than people think. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) only captures maybe one percent of all injuries and deaths caused by vaccines, which means the figures are much, much higher than what the government is reporting.

“I have a hunch that every time we give the COVID vaccine we delay natural herd immunity by another 6 months,” another physician wrote. “I would rather contract the virus and have natural immunity.”

“The Cleveland Clinic has come out with a case study indicating that titers over 200 lend adequate natural immunity. This begs the question: why do we do free testing and free vaccines but not free titers? Why is that?”

This same person went on to explain that if she was in charge as opposed to medical quacks like Tony Fauci, she would be putting everyone on a vitamin D supplement and telling them to drink a gallon of water every day and go outside for 15 minutes in the natural sunlight.

“I would start a titer draw campaign and focus on those numbers,” she added.

Hospitals are being overrun with vaccinated patients suffering cardiac events

This preventative approach is something that the American government, and really most governments, never endorse or promote. The Thai government did recently grant approval for the use of the green chiretta herb in treating the Chinese Virus, but this is certainly atypical.

The Western paradigm of medicine would rather just inject everyone with experimental mystery chemicals and keep them masked forever while pushing junk food and junk living. This, naturally, is why much of the West is now a wasteland of obesity, disease and death.

“I have seen high levels of fibrinogen in vaccinated patients awaiting surgical scheduling,” revealed another doctor, specifying that almost everyone has fibrinogen levels exceeding 900 mg/dl.

A massage practitioner explained that her vaccinated patients are seeing success reversing their vaccine damage by taking proteolytic enzymes. One patient claims to have “peed out the spike protein” upon taking proteolytic enzymes as her urine was “extremely dark for 3-4 days after / while experiencing flu-like / detoxification symptoms.”

A hospital worker posted that she is seeing “at least triple the emergency codes we had even a year ago.” It is not “covid cases” that the hospital is seeing, though, but rather stroke and cardiac events that appear to be linked to the spike proteins contained in the Chinese Virus injections.

“There have been several anomalies where patients have no thrombotic history and present with significant clot burden and at times are also significantly anemic,” this person added.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-06 19:39:20 ​​Dozens of peer-reviewed science papers prove that face masks are dangerous, ineffective

At least 47 published scientific papers confirm that face masks are utterly useless at preventing Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) infection and spread, while another 32 point out the specific health damage caused by wearing a mask.

Contrary to government and media claims, face coverings are not in any way a solution to the alleged problem of Chinese Germs – even if fake “doctors” like Tony Fauci insist otherwise. At best, they are a placebo that make the fearful feel protected. At worst, they are a ritualistic rite of passage into the “new normal” that causes plenty of bodily damage along the way.

Dr. Paul Elias Alexander wrote an article highlighting the litany of lies and misinformation that are being spread by the government about the plandemic, one of the most prominent being the idea that covering one’s breathing holes is somehow good for health.

One of the studies he highlights came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which found that a whopping 85 percent of people who contracted the Fauci Flu back in July 2020 were mask wearers. A mere 3.9 percent who tested “positive” for the Chinese Virus never wore a mask, demonstrating that not wearing a mask minimizes one’s risk of contracting the dreaded Wuhan Flu.

He also looked at a study involving “frontline” health care workers, which found that medical-grade face coverings were ineffective at preventing Chinese Virus infection and spread. If even these higher-tech breathing passage blockers did not work, how in the world can anyone say that a piece of t-shirt cloth or Chinese plastic works any better?

Wearing a mask is a recipe for early death

Several of the studies Alexander looked at found that it matters not whether a person wears a mask: rates of contagious disease are the same regardless, if not more prominent among people who mask up. Part of this is due to the fact that face coverings fail to prevent seal leakage.

Not only that, but the holes in most face coverings are far larger than the size of viral particles, meaning when a person breathes those pathogens move right through the fabric with ease – much like how mosquitos can easily pass through a chain-link fence.

The problem is even more pronounced when a person sneezes, which sends even more particulates through the already porous mesh due to their high velocity. One may as well not even be wearing a mask in the case of a cough or sneeze due to the fact that the viral material easily passes through the material.

Another consideration with masks is the way they tend to harbor disease-causing pathogens. Children who are forced to wear a mask at school all day, for instance, are potentially breathing in deadly viruses and bacteria, which are lodged right in front of the nose and mouth.

There is simply no sound science anywhere to be found that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that wearing a mask does anything other than virtue signal and show that you “care.” As far as providing any kind of protection, well, that is all just a bunch of pseudoscientific fantasy.

“No mask is available that will keep you safe,” wrote one commenter at Life Site News.

“An N-95 is for sanding. HD says ‘not for medical use.’ It will filter some wood while sanding. Look it up. The bug is in the micron range and lower. You have to use a rebreather, a sealed system, or air from home in scuba emergency air containers. You cannot breathe from your nose. Doing that will negate the point.”

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-05 23:37:06 ​​ Read the beginning of the article
Parents can also ask their health care provider to explain aspects of vaccination that they don’t understand, the emergency use authorization in place for COVID-19 vaccination, and how it compares to full approval, and even how to interpret data regarding the effectiveness and side effects of the vaccine.

In 2020, more than 2 million of nearly 30 million confirmed COVID-19 cases involved children. However, while the majority of children and teens have mild symptoms, there are rare cases where persistent symptoms continue months after recovery. Some also develop rare but serious COVID-linked conditions called multisystem inflammatory syndrome or MIS-C.

“It’s important that parents and providers don’t wait for full COVID vaccine approval to begin discussions about vaccination,” Clark said.

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-05 23:36:45 POLL: Parents ‘unlikely’ to get their children vaccinated against COVID-19, citing risks of vaccine adverse reactions

A recent poll of over 2,000 parents with children between ages three and 18 showed that half of them believe it is “unlikely” that they will have their kids vaccinated against COVID-19. The most common reason is that the parents fear the side effects of the vaccine and that it is highly unlikely for children to get infected with the SARS-CoV-19 virus anyway.

The survey, which was conducted by the CS Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health at Michigan Medicine, found that 39 percent of parents said that their children already got inoculated, but as many as 40 percent said it was “unlikely” that they will have their children vaccinated.

The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine is currently available for children ages 12 and older, but the Food and Drug Administration is considering whether or not the Moderna vaccine can be used in the same age group as well.

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted parents to think about the health of their children and their safety, from wearing masks to attending face-to-face events.

“As COVID vaccine authorizations expand to younger age groups, parents are also considering whether and when their child should get vaccinated.” Mott Poll co-director Dr. Sarah Clark said in a news release “As children prepare to return to school, our poll provides insight into parents’ current stance on vaccinating kids and what factors into their decision making.”

Doctors’ opinions can influence parents’ stance on vaccinating their children

Clinical trials are underway for authorizing vaccines for children under 12 years, however, many parents agree that the recommendation of their children’s health care provider will be influential in making their decision.

Around 70 percent of parents with children under the age of twelve say they haven’t discussed the vaccine with their children’s doctors yet.

“Typically, parents look to their child’s regular healthcare provider for information and guidance on vaccines for their child. But our report suggests that half of parents of children 12-18 years, for whom the COVID vaccine is already recommended and available, have not discussed it with their child’s provider,” Clark noted.

Other factors that parents consider are testing in children’s age group (63 percent), how well the vaccine works in children (62 percent), and their own research (56 percent).

There are many ways for parents to get information regarding the vaccine, however, some sources may be more technical or difficult to understand, while others may not be completely true and may exaggerate some aspects of information to support their own beliefs or perspectives regarding the vaccination.

Clark shared, “Discussing the COVID vaccine with pediatricians and other child health providers will help parents sort through all the data and make an informed choice that is right for their child and their family.”

“Our poll suggests parents are already forming opinions, and it’s essential that their decision-making process include accurate information, as well as a professional recommendation from the child’s healthcare provider.”

Providers can also help parents differentiate between side effects that reflect normal immune responses, such as fever and sore arms, from more serious events that could cause unintended or more serious problems. @naomirwolf
Read more Open / Comment

2021-08-04 22:50:00 ​​CDC just admitted that 74% of those infected in Massachusetts covid outbreak were “fully vaccinated”

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released a new Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report showing that three out of every four people infected during the recent Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “delta variant” outbreak in Massachusetts had already been “fully vaccinated” with a Fauci Flu “vaccine.”

Of the 469 “cases” of the Chinese Virus that were identified in Barnstable County, 346, or 74 percent, occurred in “fully vaccinated persons … who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna or had received a single dose of Janssen Johnson & Johnson vaccine at least 14 days before exposure.”

According to the CDC genomic sequencing of specimens collected from 133 patients revealed the presence of B.1.617.2, which the government is calling “delta” even though it refuses to explain how and when the testing protocol for “delta” was developed.

“Overall, 274 (79%) vaccinated patients with breakthrough infection were symptomatic,” the CDC says about the outbreak. “Among five COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized, four were fully vaccinated; no deaths were reported.”

CDC admits it used fraudulent PCR testing to identify “delta” cases

The CDC did reveal that it used fraudulent real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values to come up with its positive diagnoses for the “delta” patients it identified.

Not only are PCR tests fraudulent, generating false positives especially when cranked up high as they were all throughout 2020, but they were also designed and calibrated to identify common influenza, not the Chinese Virus.

What many people are testing “positive” for, in all reality, is just the ordinary seasonal flu. This is why there was no flu season in 2020, of course, as everyone was testing positive for Chinese Germs.

Even so, the government continues to fearmonger about the “delta variant,” blaming the unvaccinated for its continued spread among the vaccinated.

“The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible; vaccination is the most important strategy to prevent severe illness and death,” the CDC contends.

CDC: The only way to survive “delta” is to stop living

Vaccines are not enough, though, according to the government. Vaccinated people must also wear a mask indoors at all times if they hope to “flatten the curve.” Masking indoors “regardless of vaccination status” is the latest recommendation from Fauci and friends.

The CDC is also trying to scare Americans into avoiding other human beings this summer by skipping out on barbecues and staying away from large events. Living is contributing to the “spread” of the Wuhan Flu, the CDC maintains, so people need to stop living in order to stay “safe.”

If Americans refuse to do this on their own, then the CDC recommends that local jurisdictions impose new lockdowns to keep everyone as miserable as possible. Doing this will help to “flatten the curve,” says the CDC.

Keep in mind the CDC has also admitted that the PCR test is unable to identify the presence of infectious virus or any causative agent for clinical symptoms. It can be adjusted to produce just about any result the government wants, including new “variants” for which it can fearmonger the public into getting jabbed and wearing masks.

“The performance of this test has not been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-nCoV,” reads page 38 of an FDA document about the PCR test (https://t.me/naomirwolf/154). “This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

“And all the lockdowns, masks, mandates, ‘vaccines’ etc. was based on the numbers of PCR fake positive cases,” one of our commenters wrote. “There basically was no pandemic.”

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment

2021-08-04 21:05:33 ​​First autopsy of dead person vaccinated for covid found to contain spike proteins in every bodily organ

Researchers from Germany have conducted the world’s first-ever postmortem study on a corpse that prior to death had been “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). They found that every single organ of the now-deceased person’s body had become infested with spike proteins due to the jab.

About one month prior to his death, the 86-year-old man had received his first dose of a Fauci Flu shot. He later became infected with Chinese Germs and had to be rushed to a nearby hospital for treatment.

It was already too late, though. The man’s body was overtaken by the Vaccine spike proteins that ate up his vital organs and left him for dead. According to reports, the man had received a “lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a 30 ?g dose.”

“On that day and in the following 2 weeks, he presented with no clinical symptoms,” reads a paper about the case that was published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

“On day 18, he was admitted to hospital for worsening diarrhea. Since he did not present with any clinical signs of COVID-19, isolation in a specific setting did not occur. Laboratory testing revealed hypochromic anemia and increased creatinine serum levels. Antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were negative.”

By day 25, the man finally tested “positive” for Chinese Germs

It took all the way until day 25 for the man to finally test “positive” for the Fauci Flu. Just one day later, he died in the hospital of kidney and respiratory failure caused by the vaccine.

Researchers later found that the patient’s entire body had become overrun with high viral RNA loads, also known as vaccine-induced spike proteins. The man was clearly killed by the jab.

“In summary, the results of our autopsy case study in a patient with mRNA vaccine confirm the view that by first dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity can already be induced, while sterile immunity is not adequately developed,” the study concluded.

While it was discovered that the lethal injection did trigger an immune response inside the man’s body, it did absolutely nothing to stop the spread of the virus or the spike proteins that caused his organs to fail.

What this all shows, of course, is that the Vaccines are doing more harm than good – if they are doing any good at all. They also appear to be accelerating the spread of the Chinese Virus and its associated illnesses.

This is why we are urging our readers to just say no to experimental drug injections from the government. There is simply no need for anyone to take these shots unless they have some kind of death wish, in which case there are suicide help lines available to talk them out of taking their own lives with Fauci’s lethal injections.

“Sadly, after a few months, the truth will be revealed, and then those who took the jabs will become the pariahs of society!” wrote one commenter at Infowars. “Remember, this whole fake vaccine affair violates every single article of the Nuremberg Code, which the U.S. adopted decades ago.”

“What’s incredible about this whole thing, is that the drug inventors, nor the manufacturers are liable for any adverse consequences related to their Covid-19 vaccines, because they were created under an emergency declaration and considered immune to any irregularities, because their intention was to save humanity,” noted another, suggesting that this format of pushing deadly, liability-free drugs on the masses is part of the “new normal.”

“Sound familiar? Get used to it because intention covers a multitude of sins.”

Subscribe and share @naomirwolf Open / Comment