2021-11-19 23:34:26
So if Kyle had been a "White Supremacist," then he would have had no right to defend himself from armed attackers threatening his life? That's the implication here.
The fact is, not only was Kyle Rittenhouse not a "White Supremacist," but not one of the serious pro-White advocates out there would identify as such either----not White Nationalists, not American Fascists, not National Socialists. It's a meaningless term in an age when no White person is openly advocating for a return to slavery or other forms of 19th century colonial rule. It functions today only as a term of abuse, a deliberate mischaracterization of pro-White political views in order to demonize and discredit them.
By pretending that there is such a thing as a "White Supremacist" in this day and age, and implying that if someone tagged with this slanderous term would be unworthy of basic human rights, you only invite further media witch hunts of the kind which was pursued against Mr. Rittenhouse.
https://t.me/rtnews/15367
796 views20:34
W
