LadyDraza

2021-08-18 07:05:46 South Dakota got the "common core" trained vote cheater: {"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.649,"bidenj":0.325},"votes":286999,"eevp":69,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T05:02:10Z"},
{"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.648,"bidenj":0.327},"votes":286999,"eevp":69,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T05:03:52Z"} Open / Comment

2021-08-18 06:46:11 I have a couple of states I am finishing tonight, and one of them is South Dakota. But, I had to share this first and see if anyone else sees the problem with these 3 consecutive timestamp reports. These people are killing me - bout the funniest thing I have seen in these numbers so far! Not sure what happened here, but the person behind the calculator was not part of the "A" team... {"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.616,"bidenj":0.357},"votes":422645,"eevp":99,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-05T14:35:45Z"},
{"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.618,"bidenj":0.356},"votes":422646,"eevp":99,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-05T15:01:08Z"},
{"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.618,"bidenj":0.356},"votes":422649,"eevp":99,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-05T15:01:46Z"}, Open / Comment

2021-08-17 16:34:24 If anyone is interested in watching a video of a detailed explanation of how I began evaluating the data and what I see in the numbers, one of the groups I spoke with put the video of the discussion up here: https://rumble.com/vkh96p-ladydraza-pid-cruise-control-north-dakota.html Now, that I understand how the data was controlled, I do not even need to do the percent extension any longer to see the trends in the data. You can just see it on the visual plots how the votes correlate and how the percentage is controlled. Open / Comment

2021-08-17 10:17:40 If you think the national reaction to Biden’s Afghanistan is bad... wait until the public realizes he did not win Arizona. Open / Comment

2021-08-17 09:44:55 So - I am working on competing the evaluation of each of the states. What I am showing, and will continue to show further as I have more and more states to not only evaluate separately, but in comparison to each other, is that there is a coordinated control of the votes over time in each of the states. This can only be caused by two things that I can come up with. Option 1) The machines were actively controlling the vote over time by manipulating the phantom voters to approach a setpoint. Some of the states we can see that setpoint change after the call of Florida, that did not hit the intended setpoint. Those states are the ones that took forever to call, because they, also, we not at their setpoint. Option 2) The Edison data was completely fabricated and generated from a pre-configured algorithm and has nothing to do with how the votes were actually counted. If this is the case - then SOMEONE needs to explain to the American people WHY the news media was showing it off to us as if it was real and "calling" states on the basis of it. Either option indicates a HUGE amount of fraud perpetrated on the American people and we are due an explanation. Any other detailed, mathematical explanations welcome here. Open / Comment

2021-08-17 09:22:20 Oh! Out of order - but Montana had a bit of clean up to do. They sprinkled in too many phantom voters during counting. After the vote on 1/6, they still had to remove over 2000 voters and fix the final percentage a wee bit. Open / Comment

2021-08-17 09:12:45 The Edison Reset happened to give that final push into the setpoint. Open / Comment

2021-08-17 09:09:04 Hawaii made me laugh a little bit. I love Hawaii. Looking at their plots, they only had 7 reporting intervals. And, even with only 7 reporting intervals, we can still see both the percentage control approach the setpoint AND the high correlation between the two candidates. Once you see it...you just can not NOT see it... Open / Comment

2021-08-17 09:00:24 You can see where these resets are taking away from voter enthusiasm. Looks like the count would have been between 300%-250%, rather than the 200% setpoint without those handy resets. Open / Comment

2021-08-16 20:39:29 I would like to make it clear that none of the work that we have been discussing here with regard to the apparent control shown in the Edison data is affected by this. This analysis is of the reported data, not the data in transit. The efforts discussed by Mike Lindell was an attempt to discredit the .pcap data, which ,pcap data would be the most damning to show real-time vote manipulation. I will continue to provide the type of data analyses to support the audit efforts for the various states continuing forward for any of the groups that would find this data of value in convincing their legislators to conduct an full forensic audit. Open / Comment