🔥 Burn Fat Fast. Discover How! 💪

MVP Sports Consulting

Logo of telegram channel usa_tips — MVP Sports Consulting M
Logo of telegram channel usa_tips — MVP Sports Consulting
Channel address: @usa_tips
Categories: Sport
Language: English
Subscribers: 3
Description from channel

NBA NHL MLB NFL UFC FOOTBALL MLS APL TIPS BETTING NCAA SPORT PICKS MVP Sports Consulting

Ratings & Reviews

3.00

3 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

1

3 stars

1

2 stars

1

1 stars

0


The latest Messages 6

2022-06-03 18:04:21
WNBA Teaser Bet

179 viewsedited  15:04
Open / Comment
2022-06-03 07:34:57


What a game in the final Boston beauties I take their 4-2 series win, for fun
40 views04:34
Open / Comment
2022-06-02 17:51:00
And BETUS give me 100$ FP i use it for WNBA.

Aces/Sun Total Under 170
164 viewsedited  14:51
Open / Comment
2022-06-02 17:49:40
Today 2 underdogs bet 1/2 units each

In NBA i think every game 50/50
WNBA i take with personal strategy

Boston ML
Conn ML

129 viewsedited  14:49
Open / Comment
2022-06-02 06:38:24

Total 160 and +8 Lynx teaser work
153 views03:38
Open / Comment
2022-06-01 20:04:21
WNBA Teaser Bet

179 views17:04
Open / Comment
2022-05-31 21:03:07
WNBA PLAY

Conn +5
267 viewsedited  18:03
Open / Comment
2022-05-31 17:52:49 It is very important to keep in mind that playoff statistics are not very reliable even after 3 rounds. There are still not many games here, and the sample is weak. What is more important is the selection of matches against 3 teams. All these layouts need to be perceived through the prism of specific rivals.

Were floaters smeared against Boston because the Celtics defended coolly there, or because their opponents just aren't too good on these throws? Is the rebounds of Warriors in attack a consequence of their coolness, or a consequence of weakness on the shields of specific opponents? Even global things, such as the quality of defense and attack, are very conditional. Boston has a tough defense, but in the last 2 series they have been chasing 7 matches with teams without an attack. Warriors have a cool offense, but in 2 series out of 3, their opponent simply did not have the shots to defend properly.

Nevertheless, this statistic still makes a little more sense than digging up data on the "regular season", which ended a month and a half ago, and in which there is generally a different basketball and a different level of resistance.

What statistical models say

Basket-ref believes that the probability of Boston winning the series is 58.8%

RAPTOR from 538 believes that the probability of Boston winning the series is 80%

ILO from 538 believes that the probability of a Boston victory in the series is 68%

Match-up predictor from ESPN believes that the probability of Boston winning the first match is 60.4%

But the bookmaker quotes for both the first match and the outcome of the series are still in favor of the Warriors.

Personally, the chances here seem about equal to me. In ideal conditions, the Celtics would probably look a little preferable, but they are clearly more tired, and Warriors have the advantage of their own site and experience of the final series.
90 viewsedited  14:52
Open / Comment
2022-05-31 17:52:49 NBA, statistical preview for the grand final

Warriors and Celtics will meet in this season's finale. Before the start of the series, we will have a preview of the game drawing and interesting / important layouts, but for now we will focus on figures and facts.

H2H meetings

This season, the teams met twice and exchanged away wins. Boston both times threw more accurately from the game, got on the line more often and lost the ball more. The main statistical difference is the work on the shields. When Boston confidently took this category, it confidently won, when it flew a little on the shield, lost by 4 points.

But it must be borne in mind that Warriors lost playing without Wiggins, and won playing without Poole and Thompson against the Celtics without Horford and Grant (and these were still the old "celts", before their great turning point in the middle of the season). In general, representativeness raises questions.

Conditions

Boston will have less time to rest, they finished their conference finals later. In fact, the "celts" have been playing every other day for a month (two 7-match series in a row, this is 4 weeks of such a game). Boston also plays with a narrower rotation.

And the main health issue before this series is Robert Williams. He plays and doesn't play, his knee is constantly bothering him, and in the last match of the finals of the East, Rob ran for only 15 minutes. Without him, a lot of things will be covered for Boston.

Statistics

In this playoff, Boston has the second best defense (only the Bucks were cooler). And Warriors have the second best attack (only the Pelicans were more effective, but they had only one series).

Celtics' defense is really cool, but statistically in the playoffs, the main distinguishing feature of their defense is a low number of fouls. And Warriors are not particularly focused on earning free throws. A powerful feature of Warriors' attack is working on someone else's shield, and here the Celtics' defense is not too strong. The weak side of the Warriors' attack is steals (although in the series with the Mavs, this was cleaned up), but Boston will not force steals.

Warriors' defense is sixth in this playoff (the Celtics' offense is seventh). At the same time, it is difficult to distinguish statistically characteristic features - none of the teams is in the top for any of the 4 key factors.

The pace of the teams is close, Warriors are 5th in speed, Boston is 7th.

Warriors' average match in this playoff: they score 114.5 points, concede 109.1.

The average Celtics game in this playoff: they score 107.1 points, concede 101.0.

Distribution of throws

The biggest difference between Celtics' attack and the average team is the high number of three-pointers. 45.5% of their shots from the game come from beyond the arc. And Warriors of three-pointers give a lot - 44.7% of their opponents' shots from the three-way game. They realize three-pointers with a percentage of 36.5 against Golden State, and Boston hits 36.2% of its long-range shots. Everything roughly fits together and it seems clear what can be expected.

Warriors are in the lead in shots from the distance of the floater (1-3 meters), they make 27.1% of their shots from the game from there and get the best 57.3% of these shots in this PO. But against Boston from this distance they throw not so often (20.9% of all shots of the opponent), and not at all accurately (37.5% of the implementation).
85 viewsedited  14:52
Open / Comment
2022-05-31 16:00:39 Hey Today i plan a big preview of the final and if I see your support, I will put my bet on the WNBA

Share the link with your friends

https://t.me/joinchat/JkVKEMIhU5I4OGQ6
96 views13:00
Open / Comment