Sirojiddin Malikov | IELTS EVEREST

2022-04-01 06:57:55 Open / Comment

2022-03-30 14:17:40 The bar chart ranks ten countries according to their production and consumption of energy in 2014.

Overall, China and the USA were by far the biggest producers and consumers of electricity, whereas Korea public was the country with the least figure. It is also clear that almost all countries produced more energy than they consumed, with the exception of Germany whose figure for the consumption of electricity exceeded that of the production.

In detail, China was seen to have secured the top of the list with just over 5.300 billion kWh of the production and consumption rate of electricity in 2014. The second largest producer and consumer of electricity was the USA, generating 4,099 billion kWh and using 3,866 billion kWh. Russia was also able to register moderately high figure of 1,057 for production and 1,038 for consumption, one third of those of China and the USA.

In terms of the other countries, Japan and India were observed to have moderate figures of around 900 billion kWh for production and 800 billion kWh for consumption respectively, slightly less than those of Russia. The countries whose figures were similar to each other were Canada, France, Brazil and Germany, at about 500 and 400 billion kWh. The country with the lowest documented figure was Korea Republic which produced 485.1 billion kWh and consumed 449.5 billion kWh. Open / Comment

2022-03-30 14:16:19 Open / Comment

2022-03-30 09:03:24 In many parts of the world, fossil fuel is used to produce energy. Since this source of energy is damaging the environment, it is argued that we should adopt new energy sources such as wind and solar energy. In my opinion, this is a positive development seeing… Open / Comment

2022-03-30 06:22:07 In many parts of the world, fossil fuel is used to produce energy. Since this source of energy is damaging the environment, it is argued that we should adopt new energy sources such as wind and solar energy. In my opinion, this is a positive development seeing as when we say alternatives, nuclear energy is also an option.

Although fossil fuels are an efficient source of energy, they are doing more harm than good. Burning fossil fuel to generate electricity is resulting in many global problems. One of them is air pollution. When coal is burned to produce electricity, a lot of carbon emissions are released into the air, leading to pollution. Therefore, it is suggested that we stop using fossil fuels as a main source of energy. Instead, wind farms and solar panels should be used.

The problem is that these energy sources are not as plausible solution to the problems as everyone thinks. The reason for this is that building wind farms and solar panels means the destruction of large areas of natural vegetation, and they cost exorbitantly expensive. In an attempt to preserve environment, destroying the very environment is paradoxical. Moreover, building such farms requires huge funds from governments, meaning that many countries in the world may not be able to afford it.

However, there is one energy source that is always overlooked, despite being more environmentally-friendly and efficient: Nuclear energry. Nuclear power plants are zero-emission, which means that they do not damage the environment. Also, the cost of building such reactors is relatively cheap, and the use of uranium- a chemical substance used to generate energy - makes it an even more attractive option, given its cost and abundant source.

In conclusion, the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy may appear to be a better solution, but it is not as good as adopting neclear energy.

@ieltswithmrmalikov

Any feedback??? Open / Comment

2022-03-30 06:22:07 Fossil fuel is the main source o energy. However, people are being encouraged to move to such alternative energy sources as wind solar and so on.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Open / Comment

2022-03-29 07:03:22 For me this is how a band 9 language reads like Open / Comment

2022-03-29 07:02:09 Some serious writing chops here. Open / Comment

2022-03-28 16:02:27 Many people spend their money as they get it.
What are the reasons for this?
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

It is true that people have a tendency to spend their money as soon as they receive money. The reasons for this are the financial illiteracy and impulsive behavior. In my opinion, this is a negative development for two reasons.

There are two main reasons why the majority of people tend to spend money soon after they obtain it. Firstly, the financial education is not a priority in many schools. Not having financial literacy, many people struggle to manage their money. Therefore, they end up spending it all. Secondly, many people buy things on impulse, meaning that they buy products or services without a second thought. When they receive money in the form of either salary or reward, they also look for ways to spend instead of saving it. These behaviors lead people to exhaust all of their money.

I firmly believe that people's tendency to spend their money just after they get it is disadvantageous for two sound reasons. One of them is that if they do not know how to spend money wisely, the chances are they will have troubles in the future. When the crunch comes, they are highly likely to struggle asking anyone they know to give them money. This is all caused by not knowing how to manage their finances. Another possible outcome of this behavior is that their children may also have problems with money. Children grow up learning from their parents, and if they see their parents spending money recklessly, they will follow in their footsteps.

In conclusion, many people spend all of their money, and this is caused by poor financial education and impulsiveness. I think this is a negative trend because of
the above-mentioned arguments. Open / Comment

2022-03-28 10:27:44 Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Open / Comment